Literature DB >> 23845429

Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.

Maria Concetta Pellicciari1, Debora Brignani, Carlo Miniussi.   

Abstract

Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulations (tDCS) are both established techniques to induce cortical excitability changes. Typically, in the human motor system, such cortical modulations are inferred through changes in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs). However, it is now possible to directly evaluate tDCS-induced changes at the cortical level by recording the transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked potentials (TEPs) using electroencephalography (EEG). The present study investigated the modulation induced by the tDCS on the motor system. The study evaluates changes in the MEPs, in the amplitude and distribution of the TEPs, in resting state oscillatory brain activity and in behavioral performance in a simple manual response task. Both the short- and long-term tDCS effects were investigated by evaluating their time course at ~0 and 30min after tDCS. Anodal tDCS over the left primary motor cortex (M1) induced an enhancement of corticospinal excitability, whereas cathodal stimulation produced a reduction. These changes in excitability were indexed by changes in MEP amplitude. More interestingly, tDCS modulated the cortical reactivity, which is the neuronal activity evoked by TMS, in a polarity-dependent and site-specific manner. Cortical reactivity increased after anodal stimulation over the left M1, whereas it decreased with cathodal stimulation. These effects were partially present also at long term evaluation. No polarity-specific effect was found either on behavioral measures or on oscillatory brain activity. The latter showed a general increase in the power density of low frequency oscillations (theta and alpha) at both stimulation polarities. Our results suggest that tDCS is able to modulate motor cortical reactivity in a polarity-specific manner, inducing a complex pattern of direct and indirect cortical activations or inhibitions of the motor system-related network, which might be related to changes in synaptic efficacy of the motor cortex.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical reactivity; EEG; LMFP; Motor cortex; Reaction time; TEP; TMS; local mean field power; tDCS; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23845429     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  57 in total

1.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Cross-education of muscular strength is facilitated by homeostatic plasticity.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Jacqueline Williams; Michael Spittle; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Simon J Vogrin; Olivia Carter; Mark J Cook; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on cortical excitability in humans: A TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Darmani; Til O Bergmann; Carl Zipser; David Baur; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Using clinical and robotic assessment tools to examine the feasibility of pairing tDCS with upper extremity physical therapy in patients with stroke and TBI: a consideration-of-concept pilot study.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; Stacy L Fritz; Derek M Liuzzo; Roger Newman-Norlund; Troy M Herter
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 6.  Transcranial electric stimulation as a neural interface to gain insight on human brain functions: current knowledge and future perspective.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Carlo Miniussi; Maria Concetta Pellicciari
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  A Meta-analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies Examining the Reliability of Effects on Language Measures.

Authors:  Amy R Price; Harrison McAdams; Murray Grossman; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG): assessing the impact of tDCS on slow cortical magnetic fields.

Authors:  Eliana Garcia-Cossio; Matthias Witkowski; Stephen E Robinson; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  tDCS effects on brain network properties during physiological aging.

Authors:  Fabrizio Vecchio; Francesca Miraglia; Claudia Rodella; Francesca Alù; Carlo Miniussi; Paolo Maria Rossini; Maria Concetta Pellicciari
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.