Amy R Price1, Harrison McAdams2, Murray Grossman1, Roy H Hamilton3. 1. Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA. 3. Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: roy.hamilton@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a brain stimulation technique used to examine causal relationships between brain regions and cognitive functions. The effects from tDCS are complex, and the extent to which stimulation reliably affects different cognitive domains is not fully understood and continues to be debated. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To conduct a meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of single-session anodal tDCS on language. METHODS: The meta-analysis examined the behavioral results from eleven experiments of single-session anodal tDCS and language processing in healthy adults. The means and standard deviations of the outcome measures were extracted from each experiment and entered into the meta-analyses. In the first analysis, we examined the effects of single-session tDCS across all language studies. Next, a series of sub-analyses examined the effects of tDCS on specific tasks and stimulation protocols. RESULTS: There was a significant effect from anodal single-session tDCS in healthy adults compared to sham (P = 0.001) across all language measures. Next, we found significant effects on specific stimulation protocols (e.g., offline measures, P = 0.002), as well as specific tasks and electrode montages (e.g., verbal fluency measures and left prefrontal cortex, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that single-session tDCS produces significant and reliable effects on language measures in healthy adults.
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a brain stimulation technique used to examine causal relationships between brain regions and cognitive functions. The effects from tDCS are complex, and the extent to which stimulation reliably affects different cognitive domains is not fully understood and continues to be debated. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To conduct a meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of single-session anodal tDCS on language. METHODS: The meta-analysis examined the behavioral results from eleven experiments of single-session anodal tDCS and language processing in healthy adults. The means and standard deviations of the outcome measures were extracted from each experiment and entered into the meta-analyses. In the first analysis, we examined the effects of single-session tDCS across all language studies. Next, a series of sub-analyses examined the effects of tDCS on specific tasks and stimulation protocols. RESULTS: There was a significant effect from anodal single-session tDCS in healthy adults compared to sham (P = 0.001) across all language measures. Next, we found significant effects on specific stimulation protocols (e.g., offline measures, P = 0.002), as well as specific tasks and electrode montages (e.g., verbal fluency measures and left prefrontal cortex, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that single-session tDCS produces significant and reliable effects on language measures in healthy adults.
Authors: Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Evangelia G Chrysikou; Roy H Hamilton; H Branch Coslett; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Sharon L Thompson-Schill Journal: Cogn Neurosci Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.065
Authors: Felix Gervits; Sharon Ash; H Branch Coslett; Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman; Roy Hamilton Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Elisabeth A Karuza; Zuzanna Z Balewski; Roy H Hamilton; John D Medaglia; Nathan Tardiff; Sharon L Thompson-Schill Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Amy Rose Price; Jonathan E Peelle; Michael F Bonner; Murray Grossman; Roy H Hamilton Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 6.167