Literature DB >> 23844468

Acceptability of cervical and anal HPV self-sampling in a sample of Hispanic women in Puerto Rico.

Ana P Ortiz1, Natalia Alejandro, Cynthia M Pérez, Yomayra Otero, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Joel M Palefsky, Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, Josefina Romaguera.   

Abstract

Self-sampling techniques have been shown to be reliable in determining human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, although the acceptability of this method of sampling has not been studied in Puerto Rico (PR). The objective of this study was to determine the acceptability of cervicovaginal and anal self-sampling for HPV DNA testing among women in PR. One hundred women aged 18-34 years old and undergoing routine Pap smears in an OBGYN clinic in PR were recruited. Interviewer-administered and computer-based questionnaires were used to collect information on relevant risk factors. To assess acceptability, four-item acceptability Likert scales were used that measured comfort, pain, privacy, and embarrassment. Overall acceptability indexes were calculated as the sum of the Likert scores. Clinician-collected and self-collected cervicovaginal and anal samples for HPV-DNA testing were obtained from the participating women. Although the acceptability of both sampling methods was high, it was higher for self- rather than clinician-sampling of the cervix (difference in mean score = -0.71, p<0.05); contrarily, it was higher for clinician-sampling of the anus (difference in mean score = 0.64). When analyzing individual items within the scale, less embarrassment was observed with respect to the self-collection of cervical and anal samples. Nevertheless, most women reported that they preferred having a clinician collect cervical and anal samples (67% and 61%, respectively); and most of these women (86% for cervical samples and 92% for anal samples) felt more confident that this sample would be properly taken. Despite this, in this population, the high level of acceptability with regard to self-collected samples and the previously documented concordance between self- and clinician-collected samples support the use of cervical and anal HPV DNA self-sampling techniques in future HPV-related population-based studies and screening programs in PR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23844468      PMCID: PMC3954748     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P R Health Sci J        ISSN: 0738-0658            Impact factor:   0.705


  42 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed--biologic concordance and women's preferences.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Walter W Noll; Dorothy R Belloni; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among Chinese Canadian women.

Authors:  T G Hislop; M Deschamps; C Teh; C Jackson; S P Tu; Y Yasui; S M Schwartz; A Kuniyuki; V Taylor
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

3.  HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.

Authors:  T C Wright; L Denny; L Kuhn; A Pollack; A Lorincz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  Melissa Farley; Jacqueline M Golding; Jerome R Minkoff
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Ilana G Dzuba; Elsa Yunes Díaz; Betania Allen; Yvonne Flores Leonard; Eduardo C Lazcano Ponce; Keerti V Shah; David Bishai; Attila Lorincz; Daron Ferris; Bernardo Turnbull; Mauricio Hernández Avila; Jorge Salmerón
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2002-04

6.  Human papillomavirus infection in women in Puerto Rico: agreement between physician-collected and self-collected anogenital specimens.

Authors:  Ana Patricia Ortiz; Josefina Romaguera; Cynthia M Pérez; Yomayra Otero; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Keimari Méndez; Yari Valle; Maria Da Costa; Erick Suarez; Joel Palefsky; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Self-collected versus clinician-collected anal cytology specimens to diagnose anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men.

Authors:  Ross D Cranston; Teresa M Darragh; Elizabeth A Holly; Naomi Jay; J Michael Berry; Maria Da Costa; Jimmy T Efird; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Clinical evaluation of a new model of self-obtained method for the assessment of genital human papilloma virus infection in an underserved population.

Authors:  Chi-Chang Chang; Chih-Jen Tseng; Wei-wei Liu; Smita Jain; Shang-Gwo Horng; Yung-Kuei Soong; Swei Hsueh; Chia C Pao
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2002-10

9.  The accuracy and patient preference for self-collected group B Streptococcus cultures.

Authors:  B M Mercer; M C Taylor; J L Fricke; V S Baselski; B M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Attitudes to self-sampling for HPV among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in Manchester, UK.

Authors:  S Forrest; K McCaffery; J Waller; M Desai; A Szarewski; L Cadman; J Wardle
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  12 in total

1.  Acceptability of Self-Sample Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Thai Women Visiting a Colposcopy Clinic.

Authors:  Natacha Phoolcharoen; Nuttavut Kantathavorn; Wasanai Krisorakun; Chantanee Taepisitpong; Waraphorn Krongthong; Siriporn Saeloo
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-06

2.  Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women Who Submit Self-collected Vaginal Swabs After Internet Recruitment.

Authors:  Erik J Nelson; John Hughes; J Michael Oakes; Bharat Thyagarajan; James S Pankow; Shalini L Kulasingam
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-06

3.  Results of the Women's Self-Performed Anal Pap Trial in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Women.

Authors:  Candice J McNeil; Christina S Kong; Andrew Anglemyer; Vivian Levy; Yvonne Maldonado
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Examining Acceptability of Self-Collection for Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women and Healthcare Providers with a Broader Lens.

Authors:  Virginia Senkomago; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Acceptability of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Cohort of Patients from Romania (Stage 2).

Authors:  Mihaela Grigore; Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache; Petru Cianga; Daniela Constantinescu; Odetta Duma; Roxana Daniela Matasariu; Ioana-Sadiye Scripcariu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Cervical human papillomavirus infection in a sample of Hispanic women living in Puerto Rico: comparison with cervical cytology reports.

Authors:  Keimari Méndez; Josefina Romaguera; Cynthia M Pérez; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Joel M Palefsky; Ana P Ortiz
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.705

7.  HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences.

Authors:  Holly Nishimura; Ping Teresa Yeh; Habibat Oguntade; Caitlin E Kennedy; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

Review 8.  The acceptability of vaginal smear self-collection for screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalia Serrano Doratioto Faria Braz; Noely Paula Cristina Lorenzi; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso; Lana Maria de Aguiar; Edmund Chada Baracat; José Maria Soares-Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial to compare human papillomavirus based cervical cancer screening in community-health campaigns versus health facilities in western Kenya.

Authors:  Megan J Huchko; James G Kahn; Jennifer S Smith; Robert A Hiatt; Craig R Cohen; Elizabeth Bukusi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Prevalence, genotyping, and correlates of anogenital HPV infection in a population-based sample of women in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  A P Ortiz; J Romaguera; C M Pérez; D González; C Muñoz; L González; E Marrero; G Tortolero-Luna; E Suárez; J Palefsky
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2016-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.