Literature DB >> 7485347

The accuracy and patient preference for self-collected group B Streptococcus cultures.

B M Mercer1, M C Taylor, J L Fricke, V S Baselski, B M Sibai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of and patient attitudes regarding self-collected group B Streptococcus cultures. STUDY
DESIGN: Women seen for prenatal care at 24 to 42 weeks' gestation were asked to collect distal vaginal and anal samples for group B Streptococcus. Subsequently, distal vaginal and anal samples were obtained by the nurse. The patients were then asked their preference toward self-sampling.
RESULTS: A total of 251 women participated in the study. The incidence of positive group B Streptococcus cultures was 12.7%, 9.6%, 10.0%, and 7.6% for the patient-collected vaginal and anal and nurse-collected vaginal and anal specimens, respectively. The incidence of group B Streptococcus carriage was 17.5% and 13.5% for any positive patient- or provider-collected specimens, respectively, and 19.1% for any positive culture. Single patient-collected vaginal and anal and nurse-collected vaginal and anal samples were insensitive for group B Streptococcus carriage (67%, 50%, 52%, 40%, respectively). The combination of patient-collected samples was more sensitive than nurse-collected samples (sensitivity 91.7% vs 70.8%, p < 0.05). Repeat sampling of the vagina or anal canal did not offer significant additional benefit to a single culture. Overall, patient-collected samples were 98.4% accurate in predicting group B Streptococcus carriage versus 94.4% for nurses. A total of 58% of women preferred obtaining their own specimens, whereas 9.6% found the technique difficult. Ninety percent desired the option of self-sampling in the future.
CONCLUSIONS: Single vaginal or anal cultures were insensitive in detecting group B Streptococcus carriage. Combined patient-collected cultures were more sensitive than provider-collected specimens. On the basis of accuracy and patient preference, women should be given the opportunity of combined vaginal-anal self-sampling for group B Streptococcus when indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7485347     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91380-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Acceptability of a self-sampling technique to collect vaginal smears for gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Boskey; Shelly A Atherly-Trim; Patricia J O'Campo; Donna M Strobino; Dawn P Misra; P Misra
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Preventing group B streptococcal infections: new recommendations.

Authors:  H Dele Davies
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-07

4.  Preventing group B streptococcal infections: New recommendations.

Authors:  H Dele Davies
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Comparison of self-collected and physician-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis.

Authors:  Larry J Forney; Pawel Gajer; Christopher J Williams; G Maria Schneider; Sara S K Koenig; Stacey L McCulle; Shara Karlebach; Rebecca M Brotman; Catherine C Davis; Kevin Ault; Jacques Ravel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Acceptability of cervical and anal HPV self-sampling in a sample of Hispanic women in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Ana P Ortiz; Natalia Alejandro; Cynthia M Pérez; Yomayra Otero; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Joel M Palefsky; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Josefina Romaguera
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.705

Review 7.  Epidemiology of group B streptococcal disease in the United States: shifting paradigms.

Authors:  A Schuchat
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Acceptability and efficacy of vaginal self-sampling for genital infection and bacterial vaginosis: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Claire Camus; Guillaume Penaranda; Hacène Khiri; Sabine Camiade; Lucie Molet; Melissa Lebsir; Anne Plauzolles; Laurent Chiche; Bernard Blanc; Edwin Quarello; Philippe Halfon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intrapartum PCR assay versus antepartum culture for assessment of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci in a Danish cohort at birth.

Authors:  Mohammed Rohi Khalil; Niels Uldbjerg; Poul Bak Thorsen; Jens Kjølseth Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristine M Wylie; Stephanie A Blankenship; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Molly J Stout
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-10-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.