| Literature DB >> 23844365 |
Rami Al Batran1, Fouad Al-Bayaty, Mazen M Jamil Al-Obaidi, Mahmood A Abdulla.
Abstract
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of andrographolide on hyperlipidemia induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis in rats. Thirty male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were divided into five groups as follows: group 1 (vehicle) and four experimental groups (groups 2, 3, 4, and 5) were challenged orally with P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 (0.2 mL of 1.5 ×10(12) bacterial cells/mL in 2% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) five times a week for one month to induce hyperlipidemia. Then, group 3 received a standard oral treatment with simvastatin 100 mg/kg, and groups 4 and 5 received oral treatment with andrographolide 20 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, respectively, for another month. The results showed that total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were reduced significantly in groups treated with andrographolide. The malondialdehyde (MDA) level was low in treated groups, while antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were significantly increased in these groups (P < 0.05). Liver tissues of the groups treated with andrographolide reduce the accumulation of lipid droplets in hepatic tissue cells. An acute toxicity test did not show any toxicological symptoms in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23844365 PMCID: PMC3703379 DOI: 10.1155/2013/594012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Effect of andrographolide on histological sections of the liver and kidney. Histological sections of the kidney (first row) and liver (second row) in an acute toxicity test. ((a) and (d)) Section from rats treated with CMC. ((b) and (e)) Sections from rats treated with 100 mg/kg andrographolide. ((c) and (f)) Sections from rats treated with 500 mg/kg andrographolide. There are no differences in the structures of the livers and kidneys between the treated and control groups (H&E staining, 20x).
Effect of andrographolide on blood lipids in hyperlipidemic rats.
| TC (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 1.55 ± 0.02* | 1.48 ± 0.04* | 0.085 ± 0.002* | 0.483 ± 0.04 |
| Group 2 | 1.8 ± 0.00 | 1.63 ± 0.01 | 0.147 ± 0.004 | 0.55 ± 0.02 |
| Group 3 | 1.35 ± 0.02* | 1.33 ± 0.04* | 0.088 ± 0.003* | 0.28 ± 0.03* |
| Group 4 | 1.78 ± 0.01* | 1.38 ± 0.01* | 0.093 ± 0.033* | 0.25 ± 0.02* |
| Group 5 | 1.33 ± 0.01* | 1.24 ± 0.01* | 0.085 ± 0.002* | 0.35 ± 0.02* |
(TC) Total cholesterol; F (4,25) = 137.7, P < 0.001, (LDL-C) low-density lipoprotein; F (4,25) = 33.49, P < 0.001, (HDL-C) High-density lipoprotein; F (4,25) = 72.6, P < 0.001, (TG) triglycerides; F (4,25) = 20.5, P < 0.001.
Group (1) vehicle; Group (2) vehicle and P. gingivalis; Group (3) simvastatin (100 mg/kg); Group (4) andrographolide 20 mg/kg; Group (5) andrographolide 10 mg/kg. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dennett's post hoc test for average comparison on SPSS 18.0. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) were used. Significance was defined as P < 0.05 compared to G2. Values without an asterisk do not have significant difference compared to G2.
Effect of andrographolide on kidney biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats.
| Na (mmol/L) | K (mmol/L) | Urea (mmol/L) | Creatinine ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 143.17 ± 0.4* | 4.47 ± 0.1 | 10.5 ± 0.24 | 38 ± 2.45 |
| Group 2 | 138.67 ± 0.33 | 4.13 ± 0.07 | 11.97 ± 0.29 | 45.5 ± 0.22 |
| Group 3 | 143.5 ± 0.34* | 4.32 ± 0.05 | 12.62 ± 0.39 | 39.5 ± 2.69 |
| Group 4 | 144.5 ± 0.34* | 4.7 ± 0.18* | 11.98 ± 0.46 | 43.17 ± 2.82 |
| Group 5 | 146.17 ± 0.4* | 4.47 ± 0.08 | 11.67 ± 0.55 | 41.17 ± 0.54 |
Sodium (Na); F (4,25) = 58.4, P < 0.001, Potassium (K); F (4,25) = 3.9, P < 0.05, Urea; F (4,25) = 3.7, P < 0.05, Creatinine; F (4,25) = 2.0, P = 0.119.
Group (1) vehicle; Group (2) vehicle and P. gingivalis; Group (3) simvastatin (100 mg/kg); Group (4) andrographolide 20 mg/kg; Group (5) andrographolide 10 mg/kg. Statistical Analysis of the data was carried out using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dennett's post hoc test for average comparison on SPSS 18.0. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) were used. Significance was defined as P < 0.05 compared to G2. Values without an asterisk do not have significant difference compared to G2.
Effect of andrographolide on liver biomarkers in hyperlipidemic rats.
| Albumin (G/L) | TB (umol/L) | AP (IU/L) | ALT (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 14 ± 0.37* | 3 ± 0.00 | 60.67 ± 2.82* | 58 ± 0.52* | 214.6 ± 8.01* |
| Group 2 | 11.67 ± 0.21 | 2.5 ± 0.22 | 84.17 ± 0.95 | 65.17 ± 0.87 | 184 ± 3.98 |
| Group 3 | 13 ± 0.00* | 2.5 ± 0.22 | 68.83 ± 0.95* | 65.83 ± 2.54 | 216.8 ± 3.25* |
| Group 4 | 13.33 ± 0.21* | 2.5 ± 0.22 | 63.17 ± 1.81* | 59.17 ± 0.87* | 238.3 ± 12.1* |
| Group 5 | 12.67 ± 0.21* | 2 ± 0.00 | 62.67 ± 1.93* | 48.33 ± 1.8* | 236.5 ± 2.43* |
Albumin F (4,25) = 11.2, P < 0.001, (TB) Total bilirubin; F (4,25) = 4.2, P < 0.05, (AP) Alkaline phosphatase; F (4,25) = 27.4, P < 0.001, (ALT) Alanine aminotransferase; F (4,25) = 21.7, P < 0.001, (AST) Aspartate aminotransferase; F (4,25) = 9.9, P < 0.001.
Group (1) vehicle; Group (2) vehicle and P. gingivalis; Group (3) simvastatin (100 mg/kg); Group (4) andrographolide 20 mg/kg; Group (5) andrographolide 10 mg/kg. Statistical Analysis of the data was carried out using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dennett's post hoc test for average comparison on SPSS 18.0. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) were used. Significance was defined as *P < 0.05 compared to G2. Values without an asterisk do not have significant difference compared to G2.
Figure 2Effect of andrographolide on (MDA, SOD, and GPx) activity in serum in hyperlipidemic rats. (a) Effect of andrographolide on (MDA) malondialdehyde (F (4,25) = 16.8, P < 0.001), (b) (SOD) superoxide dismutase (F (4,25) = 485.5, P < 0.001), and (c) (GPx) glutathione peroxidase (F (4,25) = 69.9, P < 0.001). Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's post hoc test for average comparison on SPSS 18.0. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) were used. Significance was defined as *P < 0.05 compared to control group.
Figure 3Effect of andrographolide on liver tissue morphology in hyperlipidemia rats. (a) No fat droplets were found in the liver of normal control group; (b) many large fat droplets were indicated by the arrowheads in the liver of rats challenged orally with P. gingivalis; (c) lower accumulation of lipid droplets shown in hepatic tissue of treatment group with 20 mg/kg andrographolide (H&E staining, 20x).