Literature DB >> 23842890

Incremental prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction in low risk patients undergoing echocardiography: beyond Framingham score.

Wael A AlJaroudi1, M Chadi Alraies, Carmel Halley, Venu Menon, L Leonardo Rodriguez, Richard A Grimm, James D Thomas, Wael A Jaber.   

Abstract

We sought to assess the prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in low-risk adults beyond Framingham risk score (FRS). Consecutive patients without cardiovascular risk factors or co-morbidities were identified from a retrospective cohort. Multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with DD, and Cox proportional hazard model to evaluate the association of DD with all-cause death. Analysis was repeated by stratifying by the year of the echocardiogram to account for possible time-related shift in measurement techniques. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) was performed to assess incremental prognostic value of DD. The study cohort consisted on 1,039 patients with a mean age (SD) 47.9 (15.7) years. Overall, 346 patients (33.3 %) had DD, among whom 327 were grade 1. Age was the only independent predictor of DD with odds ratio 3.2 (2.8; 3.7) for every 10 years increase (p < 0.0001). After a mean follow-up time (SD) of 7.3 (1.7) years, 71 (6.8 %) patients died. Adjusting for age, gender, and race, DD remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality with hazard ratio (95 % CI) 2.03 (p = 0.029), and similarly after adjusting for FRS (HR 2.73, p = 0.002) which resulted in IDI gain of 1.4 % (p = 0.0037) and NRI of 15 % (p = 0.029). In 463 age and gender matched subgroups, DD was still an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.6 [1.25; 5.55], p = 0.01). In low-risk adult outpatients undergoing echocardiography, DD was associated with 2-3 fold increase in risk of death and had incremental prognostic value beyond FRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23842890     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0246-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  Primary and subsequent coronary risk appraisal: new results from the Framingham study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; M W Russell; D M Huse; R C Ellison; H Silbershatz; P W Wilson; S C Hartz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Evaluation and management of diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Brad G Angeja; William Grossman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography.

Authors:  Sherif F Nagueh; Christopher P Appleton; Thierry C Gillebert; Paolo N Marino; Jae K Oh; Otto A Smiseth; Alan D Waggoner; Frank A Flachskampf; Patricia A Pellikka; Arturo Evangelista
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  The effects of aging and physical activity on Doppler measures of diastolic function.

Authors:  Anand Prasad; Zoran B Popovic; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Qi Fu; Dean Palmer; Erika Dijk; Neil L Greenberg; Mario J Garcia; James D Thomas; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Impact of progression of diastolic dysfunction on mortality in patients with normal ejection fraction.

Authors:  Wael Aljaroudi; M Chadi Alraies; Carmel Halley; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; James D Thomas; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Mortality rate in patients with diastolic dysfunction and normal systolic function.

Authors:  Carmel M Halley; Penny L Houghtaling; Mazen K Khalil; James D Thomas; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-27

8.  Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure.

Authors:  Garvan C Kane; Barry L Karon; Douglas W Mahoney; Margaret M Redfield; Veronique L Roger; John C Burnett; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

Authors:  G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-28
View more
  7 in total

1.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  How to identify hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk? The role of echocardiography.

Authors:  Cesare Cuspidi; Marijana Tadic; Carla Sala; Guido Grassi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-03-07

4.  Prevalence and Predictors of Diastolic Dysfunction According to Different Classification Criteria: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young in Adults Study.

Authors:  Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Laura A Colangelo; Joao A C Lima; David R Jacobs; Carlos J Rodriguez; Samuel S Gidding; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 5.363

5.  Factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Ge; Feng-Zhi Li; Bang-Chuan Hu; Li-Hong Wang; Ding-Yuan Ren
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Prognostic power of conventional echocardiography in individuals without history of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luciana Pereira Fernandes; Ana Terra Fonseca Barreto; Mansueto Gomes Neto; Edmundo José Nassri Câmara; André Rodrigues Durães; Leonardo Roever; Roque Aras-Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  A simple, fast and reproducible echocardiographic approach to grade left ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  Bas M van Dalen; Mihai Strachinaru; Julio van der Swaluw; Marcel L Geleijnse
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.