| Literature DB >> 23840505 |
Minghao Dong1, Ling Zhao, Kai Yuan, Fang Zeng, Jinbo Sun, Jixin Liu, Dahua Yu, Karen M von Deneen, Fanrong Liang, Wei Qin, Jie Tian.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The research on brain plasticity has fascinated researchers for decades. Use/training serves as an instrumental factor to influence brain neuroplasticity. Parallel to acquisition of behavioral expertise, extensive use/training is concomitant with substantial changes of cortical structure. Acupuncturists, serving as a model par excellence to study tactile-motor and emotional regulation plasticity, receive intensive training in national medical schools following standardized training protocol. Moreover, their behavioral expertise is corroborated during long-term clinical practice. Although our previous study reported functional plastic brain changes in the acupuncturists, whether or not structural plastic changes occurred in acupuncturists is yet elusive. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23840505 PMCID: PMC3686711 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The schematic diagram of tactile-motor procedures during acupuncture manipulation.
The schematic diagram for the feedback loop underlying tactile-motor procedures in the process of acupuncture. The patients’ concurrent bodily response to each round of needling manipulation is transmitted to acupuncturist through the fine needle. The acupuncturist distinguishes the subtle difference between the actual tactile sensation and the expected one. The tactile discrimination is followed by motor planning procedure in which the next-step plan of method of needling manipulation, frequency and intensity of rotation is generated. Then, the postural configuration from the motor plan is executed as acupuncturist’s fine and coordinated finger movement over the needles. This feedback loop is repeated until the target response is obtained.
Measure of fine motor skill for fingers and spatial discrimination threshold in two groups.
| Experts(n = 22) | NA(n = 22) | two sample t (Experts vs. NA) | ||||
| Task | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
|
|
| NoR | 90.1 | 6.9 | 46.1 | 7.5 | 2.73E-23 | 20.2501 |
| SDT | 0.93 | 0.23 | 1.11 | 0.18 | 0.0065 | −2.8627 |
| SDT | 1.16 | 0.18 | 1.33 | 0.12 | 6.60E-04 | −3.6795 |
NoR: number of rotations; SDT: spatial discrimination threshold; SD: standard deviation;
denotes the item that shows significant difference between the two groups ( ).
Dispositional measurement of empathy and ratings of unpleasantness in two groups.
| Experts(n = 22) | NA(n = 22) | two sample t (Experts vs. NA) | ||||
| Task | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | p value | t value |
|
| 26.5 | 3.8 | 26.6 | 4.3 | 0.94 | −0.07 |
|
| 5.8 | 0.5 | 5.6 | 0.8 | 0.38 | 0.89 |
|
| 18.4 | 3.7 | 18.2 | 3.1 | 0.86 | 0.17 |
|
| 21.1 | 3.2 | 20.4 | 3.6 | 0.45 | 0.76 |
|
| 11.8 | 3.5 | 12.5 | 4.1 | 0.76 | −0.31 |
|
| 17.5 | 4.1 | 16.9 | 3.7 | 0.65 | 0.46 |
|
| 1.6 | 0.7 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 1.06E-21 | −18.38 |
ECS: emotional contagion scale; SPQ: situational pain questionnaire; IRI: interpersonal reaction index; PT: perspective taking; EC: empathic concern; PD: personal distress; FS: fantasy; SD: standard deviation;
denotes the item that shows significant difference between the acupuncturists and NA ( ).
Figure 2Cerebral VBM differences between groups (p<0.01, corrected) and regression analysis (p<0.05, Bonferroni corrected).
The GMV differences in cerebral regions between groups. Positive linear correlations were found between GMV in the left SI and the duration of acupuncture practice. All images are shown as (1-p) corrected p-value images at the threshold of p<0.01, corrected. The corresponding t values are provided. The vACC/VMPFC was displayed in the sagittal view, and SI in the axial view (on the left side) and the coronal view (on the right side) using MRIcro. vACC/VMPFC: ventral anterior cingulate cortex/ventral medial prefrontal cortex; primary somatosensory cortex: SI.
Figure 3Cerebellar VBM differences between groups (p<0.01, corrected) and regression analysis (p<0.05, Bonferroni corrected).
The GMV differences in cerebellar regions between groups. Positive linear correlations were found between GMV in the right lobule V/VI and the duration of acupuncture practice. All images are shown as (1-p) corrected p-value images at the threshold of p<0.01, corrected. The corresponding t values are provided. The Lobule V/VI was displayed in the axial view (the upper figure) and the coronal view (the lower figure) using MRIcroN.
Significant grey matter volume differences in the acupuncturists group (p<0.01, corrected).
| Hemisphere | MNI Coordinates (cluster maxima) |
| |||
| x | y | z | |||
| vACC/VMPFC | L | −1 | 39 | −7 | 6.42 |
| R | 3 | 47 | −7 | 6.37 | |
| SI | L | −44 | −20 | 59 | 6.53 |
| Lobule V/VI | R | 26 | −47 | −24 | 6.60 |
vACC: ventral anterior cingulate cortex; VMPFC: ventral medial prefrontal cortex; SI: primary somatosensory cortex; L, left; R, right.