| Literature DB >> 25852511 |
Minghao Dong1, Jun Li2, Xinfa Shi3, Shudan Gao2, Shijun Fu3, Zongquan Liu3, Fanrong Liang4, Qiyong Gong5, Guangming Shi3, Jie Tian6.
Abstract
It is well established that expertise modulates evoked brain activity in response to specific stimuli. Recently, researchers have begun to investigate how expertise influences the resting brain. Among these studies, most focused on the connectivity features within/across regions, i.e., connectivity patterns/strength. However, little concern has been given to a more fundamental issue whether or not expertise modulates baseline brain activity. We investigated this question using amplitude of low-frequency (<0.08 Hz) fluctuation (ALFF) as the metric of brain activity and a novel expertise model, i.e., acupuncturists, due to their robust proficiency in tactile perception and emotion regulation. After the psychophysical and behavioral expertise screening procedure, 23 acupuncturists and 23 matched non-acupuncturists (NA) were enrolled. Our results explicated higher ALFF for acupuncturists in the left ventral medial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and the contralateral hand representation of the primary somatosensory area (SI) (corrected for multiple comparisons). Additionally, ALFF of VMPFC was negatively correlated with the outcomes of the emotion regulation task (corrected for multiple comparisons). We suggest that our study may reveal a novel connection between the neuroplasticity mechanism and resting state activity, which would upgrade our understanding of the central mechanism of learning. Furthermore, by showing that expertise can affect the baseline brain activity as indicated by ALFF, our findings may have profound implication for functional neuroimaging studies especially those involving expert models, in that difference in baseline brain activity may either smear the spatial pattern of activations for task data or introduce biased results into connectivity-based analysis for resting data.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncturist; amplitude of low frequency fluctuation; baseline brain activity; expertise; functional plasticity; resting state functional MRI
Year: 2015 PMID: 25852511 PMCID: PMC4365689 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Psychophysical measurement of tactile ability in the acupuncturist and NA groups.
| Expert ( | Controls ( | Mann-Whiteney U-Test (Experts vs. NA) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 1.12 | 0.15 | 1.29 | 0.14 | <1E-3 | −3.499 | |
| 0.89 | 0.22 | 1.1 | 0.18 | 0.001 | −3.288 | |
* denotes the item that shows a significant difference between groups. p < 0.05.
∧ denotes that Mann-Whitney test was used.
Figure 1Results of the behavioral analysis. (A) Results of tactile discrimination ability test. Acupuncturists had a significantly lower SDT than that of the control group for both fingers (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001 for the thumb and the index finger respectively, Mann-Whitney test). (B) Results of the emotion regulation proficiency test. Unpleasantness ratings for neutral stimuli did not differ in the two groups (p = 0.21, Mann-Whitney test). Unpleasantness ratings for negative stimuli were significantly lower in the acupuncturist group (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05). ACU: acupuncturists; NA: non-acupuncturists; * denotes significant difference between groups.
Dispositional measurement of empathy and ratings of unpleasantness in the acupuncturist and NA groups.
| Expert ( | Controls ( | Mann-Whiteney U-Test (Experts vs. NA) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 29.6 | 13.7 | 31.7 | 15.3 | 0.621 | −0.499 | |
| 5.4 | 0.8 | 5.5 | 0.9 | 0.813 | −0.273 | |
| 16.5 | 2.9 | 17.3 | 3.1 | 0.579 | −0.566 | |
| 19.2 | 3.4 | 20.3 | 2.9 | 0.2526 | −1.1593 | |
| 12.5 | 4.9 | 13.3 | 3.7 | 0.332 | −0.982 | |
| 17.5 | 3.6 | 16.8 | 4.3 | 0.619 | −0.507 | |
| 1.7 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.212 | −1.348 | |
| 2.9 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 1.2 | <1E-3 | −5.881 | |
Abbreviations: emotional contagion scale (ECS), situational pain questionnaire (SPQ), interpersonal reaction index (IRI), perspective taking (PT), empathic concern (EC), personal distress (PD) and fantasy (FS); standard deviation, SD;
*denotes the item that shows significant difference between groups. p < 0.001.
∧denotes that Mann-Whitney test was used.
#denotes that two-sample t-test was used.
Figure 2Results of ALFF differences between groups ( the acupuncturist group showed larger ALFF in the left VMPFC (displayed in sagittal view) and the left SI (displayed in axial view). (B) Significant correlation between ALFF and unpleasantness ratings was found in the left VMPFC. The statistical threshold was set at |Z| > 3.29 (p < 0.001 at the individual voxel level) and cluster size >45 voxels, which corresponds to a corrected p < 0.05. (C) scatter plot map computed as ALFF of the peak voxel in the correlation analysis and unpleasantness ratings. VMPFC: the ventral medial prefrontal cortex; SI: the primary somatosensory cortex.
Significant group ALFF differences for the acupuncturist group (p.
| Hemisphere | MNI Coordinates (cluster maxima) | Voxels | t (cluster maxima) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMPFC | L | −4 | 50 | −8 | 29 | 6.9 |
| SI | L | −48 | −12 | 53 | 16 | 7.29 |
VMPFC: ventral medial prefrontal cortex; SI: primary somatosensory area.