Literature DB >> 23839681

Circulatory and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during sevoflurane, isoflurane, or halothane anesthesia.

K Yamada1, K Shingu, H Kimura, S Ikeda, K Tsushima, T Imanishi, K Murao.   

Abstract

The anesthetic suppression of responses to noxious stimuli might reflect a summation of the suppression of the basal functions and the response capability. We investigated the basal suppression and response capability in hemodynamics and plasma catecholamine levels with different anesthetics at the same minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) level. Fifty-four patients were allocated to one of 6 groups to receive sevoflurane, isoflurane, or halothane at 1.25 or 2.0 MAC. Anesthesia was induced with the test agent in oxygen and the end-tidal concentration of the agent was maintained for at least 15 min at 1.25 or 2.0 MAC. The trachea was intubated under muscle relaxation with 0.1 mg·kg(-1) vecuronium. Skin incisions were made after maintaining the end-tidal concentration of the agent for at least 15 min after tracheal intubation. The mean arterial pressure, heart rate, rate-pressure product, and plasma levels of noradrenaline and adrenaline at the prestimuli period showed no difference between agents at each MAC. The rises in these variables by tracheal intubation and skin incision were greatest in the sevoflurane group, least in the halothane group, and intermediate in the isoflurane group. Although basal hemodynamic suppression is similar at the same MAC, the suppressive action of sevoflurane on the circulatory response capability to noxious stimuli is weaker than that of isoflurane and halothane.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 23839681     DOI: 10.1007/BF02480071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

1.  End-tidal halothane concentration for endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  R W Yakaitis; C D Blitt; J P Angiulo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: a standard of anesthetic potency.

Authors:  E I Eger; L J Saidman; B Brandstater
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1965 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  MAC of sevoflurane in humans and the New Zealand white rabbit.

Authors:  M S Scheller; L J Saidman; B L Partridge
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Effects of anesthesia on norepinephrine kinetics. Comparison of propofol and halothane anesthesia in dogs.

Authors:  R Deegan; H B He; A J Wood; M Wood
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Naloxone does not antagonize the anesthetic-induced depression of nociceptor-driven spinal cord response in spinal cats.

Authors:  K Shingu; M Osawa; Y Omatsu; T Komatsu; N Urabe; K Mori
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  The divergent actions of volatile anaesthetics on background neuronal activity and reactive capability in the central nervous system in cats.

Authors:  T Ogawa; K Shingu; M Shibata; M Osawa; K Mori
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Effect of enflurane and isoflurane on norepinephrine kinetics: a new approach to assessment of sympathetic function during anesthesia.

Authors:  R Deegan; H B He; A J Wood; M Wood
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Effects of sevoflurane on central nervous system electrical activity in cats.

Authors:  M Osawa; K Shingu; M Murakawa; T Adachi; J Kurata; N Seo; T Murayama; S Nakao; K Mori
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in humans.

Authors:  T Katoh; K Ikeda
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Anesthetic doses blocking adrenergic (stress) and cardiovascular responses to incision--MAC BAR.

Authors:  M F Roizen; R W Horrigan; B M Frazer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 7.892

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A comparison between sevoflurane and propofol when combined with continuous epidural blockade in adult patients.

Authors:  Koichi Tsushima; Koh Shingu; Heiji Okuda; Izumi Fukunaka; Kohei Murao; Hitoshi Taguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.078

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.