Literature DB >> 28921244

A comparison between sevoflurane and propofol when combined with continuous epidural blockade in adult patients.

Koichi Tsushima1, Koh Shingu1, Heiji Okuda1, Izumi Fukunaka1, Kohei Murao1, Hitoshi Taguchi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effects of sevoflurane and propofol, in combination with continuous epidural blockade, on blood pressure control and time of recovery from anesthesia were compared.
METHODS: Adult patients were allocated to either a sevoflurane (n=54) or a propofol (n=64) group. Anesthesia was induced with either inhalation of 5% sevoflurane or intravenous administration of 2 mg·kg-1 propofol. After an injection of vecuronium, the trachea was intubated and anesthesia was maintained with continuous epidural blockade, air/oxygen, and sevoflurane or propofol. The systolic arterial pressure was maintained within ±30% of that obtained on the ward.
RESULTS: The number of cases requiring a change in the dose of either anesthetics or vasoactive agents was not different between the groups. However, the arterial pressure and heart rate were more stable in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group (P<0.05). The length of time before tracheal extubation was shorter in the sevoflurane group (10.4±5.2 min, mean±SD) than the propofol group (15.0±11.2 min,P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Propofol anesthesia, in combination with continuous epidural blockade, results in more stable intraoperative hemodynamics than sevoflurane anesthesia, but requries a longer recovery time and results in larger interindividual variability than sevoflurane anesthesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative study; Epidural anesthesia; Propofol; Sevoflurane

Year:  1998        PMID: 28921244     DOI: 10.1007/BF02480773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  M A Hughes; P S Glass; J R Jacobs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Circulatory and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during sevoflurane, isoflurane, or halothane anesthesia.

Authors:  K Yamada; K Shingu; H Kimura; S Ikeda; K Tsushima; T Imanishi; K Murao
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.

Authors:  W S Jellish; C A Lien; H J Fontenot; R Hall
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol.

Authors:  B Fredman; M H Nathanson; I Smith; J Wang; K Klein; P F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Recovery characteristics following anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol in adults undergoing out-patient surgery.

Authors:  C Wandel; S Neff; H Böhrer; A Browne; J Motsch; E Martin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Acute ventilatory changes during i.v. induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol in man. Studies using inductance plethysmography.

Authors:  R M Grounds; D L Maxwell; M B Taylor; V Aber; D Royston
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  The role of the phrenic nerves in stress response in upper abdominal surgery.

Authors:  H Segawa; K Mori; K Kasai; J Fukata; K Nakao
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.108

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.