Literature DB >> 23838683

Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics.

Nick Allum1, Elissa Sibley2, Patrick Sturgis3, Paul Stoneman3.   

Abstract

The use of genetics in medical research is one of the most important avenues currently being explored to enhance human health. For some, the idea that we can intervene in the mechanisms of human existence at such a fundamental level can be at minimum worrying and at most repugnant. In particular, religious doctrines are likely to collide with the rapidly advancing capability for science to make such interventions. The key ingredient for acceptance of genetics, on the other hand, is prototypically assumed to be scientific literacy - familiarity and understanding of the critical facts and methods of science. However, this binary opposition between science and religion runs counter to what is often found in practice. In this paper, we examine the association between religiosity, science knowledge and attitudes to medical genetics amongst the British public. In particular, we test the hypothesis that religion acts as a 'perceptual filter' through which citizens acquire and use scientific knowledge in the formation of attitudes towards medical genetics in various ways.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; genetic and reproductive technologies; genetic testing; religion; scientific literacy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23838683     DOI: 10.1177/0963662513492485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  15 in total

1.  Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies.

Authors:  Katherine W Saylor; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-LaVigne; Deborah E Sellers; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Playing God? Religious Perspectives on Manipulating the Genome.

Authors:  V Kalidasan; Kumitaa Theva Das
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Religious Scholars' Attitudes and Views on Ethical Issues Pertaining to Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.

Authors:  A Olesen; S N Nor; L Amin
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.352

7.  Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.

Authors:  Matthew Nisbet; Ezra M Markowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Nick Allum; Agnes Allansdottir; George Gaskell; Jürgen Hampel; Jonathan Jackson; Andreea Moldovan; Susanna Priest; Sally Stares; Paul Stoneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers.

Authors:  Stefan P L de Jong; Elena Ketting; Leonie van Drooge
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-10-08

10.  Why women choose compounded bioidentical hormone therapy: lessons from a qualitative study of menopausal decision-making.

Authors:  Jennifer Jo Thompson; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mark Nichter
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.