Literature DB >> 23836738

Medicare beneficiaries more likely to receive appropriate ambulatory services in HMOs than in traditional medicare.

John Z Ayanian1, Bruce E Landon, Alan M Zaslavsky, Robert C Saunders, L Gregory Pawlson, Joseph P Newhouse.   

Abstract

With quality-of-care bonus payments now available for Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and for accountable care organizations in traditional Medicare, the need to understand the relative quality of care delivered to Medicare enrollees has increased. We compared the quality of ambulatory care from 2003 through 2009 between beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage HMOs and those enrolled in traditional Medicare, and we assessed how the performance of various types of Medicare HMOs differed from that of traditional Medicare for these same measures. We found that beneficiaries in Medicare HMOs were consistently more likely than those in traditional Medicare to receive appropriate breast cancer screening, diabetes care, and cholesterol testing for cardiovascular disease. We also found that Medicare HMO physicians were rated less favorably by their patients than were physicians in traditional Medicare in 2003; however, by 2009 the opposite was true. Not-for-profit, larger, and older Medicare HMOs performed consistently more favorably on clinical measures and ratings of care than for-profit, smaller, and newer HMOs. Our results suggest that the positive effects of more-integrated delivery systems on the quality of ambulatory care in Medicare HMOs may outweigh the potential incentives to restrict care under capitated payments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Managed Care—Medicare; Medicare; Quality Of Care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23836738      PMCID: PMC3925369          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  19 in total

1.  Health plan characteristics and consumers' assessments of quality.

Authors:  B E Landon; A M Zaslavsky; N D Beaulieu; J A Shaul; P D Cleary
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Shulamit L Bernard; Matthew J Cioffi; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Amal N Trivedi; Alan M Zaslavsky; Eric C Schneider; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit health plans enrolling Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Eric C Schneider; Alan M Zaslavsky; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 5.  Medicare and managed care.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care.

Authors:  B E Landon; I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Chris Quale; Philip W Chu; Robert Rosenberg; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Quality of care in investor-owned vs not-for-profit HMOs.

Authors:  D U Himmelstein; S Woolhandler; I Hellander; S M Wolfe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: is there bias?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Bruce E Landon; John Z Ayanian; Catherine Borbas; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Analysis Of Medicare Advantage HMOs compared with traditional Medicare shows lower use of many services during 2003-09.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert C Saunders; L Gregory Pawlson; Joseph P Newhouse; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  27 in total

1.  Health Care Spending and Utilization in Public and Private Medicare.

Authors:  Vilsa Curto; Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Jonathan Levin; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2019-04

2.  Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.

Authors:  Lina D Song; Joseph P Newhouse; Xabier Garcia-De-Albeniz; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Likelihood of hospital readmission in Medicare Advantage and Fee-For-Service within same hospital.

Authors:  Daniel H Jung; Eva DuGoff; Maureen Smith; Mari Palta; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; John Mullahy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Performance on Clinical Quality and Patient Experience Measures: Comparisons from Three Large States.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Andy Bogart; Cheryl L Damberg; Marc N Elliott; Ann Haas; Sarah J Gaillot; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  How successful is Medicare Advantage?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Monitoring among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jeffrey Souza; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Celebrating National Public Health Week.

Authors:  Gail R Wilensky
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Implications of Variation in the Relationships between Beneficiary Characteristics and Medicare Advantage CAHPS Measures.

Authors:  Laura A Hatfield; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Misclassification Risk of Tier-Based Physician Quality Performance Systems.

Authors:  John L Adams; Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Racial and ethnic disparities among enrollees in Medicare Advantage plans.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Bruce E Landon; Joseph P Newhouse; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.