Literature DB >> 23836299

Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial.

Marco Monticone1, Simona Ferrante, Marco Teli, Barbara Rocca, Calogero Foti, Alessio Lovi, Marco Brayda Bruno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a rehabilitation programme including the management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia on disability, dysfunctional thoughts, pain, and the quality of life in patients after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or lumbar spinal stenosis.
METHODS: This was a parallel-group, randomised, superiority-controlled study in which 130 patients were randomly assigned to a programme consisting of exercises and cognitive-behavioural therapy (experimental group, 65 subjects) or exercises alone (control group, 65 subjects). Before treatment (T1), 4 weeks later (post-treatment analysis, T2) and 12 months after the end of treatment (follow-up, T3), all the patients completed a booklet containing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, primary outcome), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophising Scale, a pain Numerical Rating Scale, and the Short-Form Health Survey. A linear mixed model for repeated measures was used for each outcome measure.
RESULTS: The ODI linear mixed model revealed significant main effects of group (F(1,122.8) = 95.78, p < 0.001) and time (F(2,120.1) = 432.02, p < 0.001) in favour of the experimental group. There was a significant group × time interaction effect (F(2,120.1) = 20.37, p < 0.001). The analyses of all of the secondary outcome measures revealed a significant effect of time, group and interaction in favour of the experimental group.
CONCLUSION: The rehabilitation programme, including the management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia, was superior to the exercise programme in reducing disability, dysfunctional thoughts, and pain, and enhancing the quality of life of patients after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or LSS. The effects lasted for at least 1 year after the intervention ended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23836299      PMCID: PMC3897823          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2889-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar segmental 'instability': clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management.

Authors:  P B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2000-02

2.  Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during physical therapy.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Friedmar Graichen; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-01

3.  The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming.

Authors:  G Apolone; P Mosconi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data.

Authors:  D C Turk; T E Rudy
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-04

5.  Measurement of pain.

Authors:  E C Huskisson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability.

Authors:  G Crombez; J W Vlaeyen; P H Heuts; R Lysens
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Paola Baiardi; Silvano Ferrari; Calogero Foti; Raffaele Mugnai; Paolo Pillastrini; Barbara Rocca; Carla Vanti
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Lumbar spinal fusion patients' demands to the primary health sector: evaluation of three rehabilitation protocols. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Rikke Soegaard; Finn B Christensen; Ida Lauerberg; Ida Lauersen; Cody E Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Henry C Tong; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christopher Parres; Douglas J Quint; Anthony Chiodo; Jennifer A Miner; Vaishali C Phalke; Julian T Hoff; Michael E Geisser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Importance of the back-café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Finn B Christensen; Ida Laurberg; Cody E Bünger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  27 in total

1.  A descriptive study of the utilization of physical therapy for postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Emilio J Puentedura; Ina Diener
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme improves disability, kinesiophobia and walking ability in subjects with chronic low back pain: results of a randomised controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Emilia Ambrosini; Barbara Rocca; Silvia Magni; Flavia Brivio; Simona Ferrante
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2014.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Clinton J Devin; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Steven Z George; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Pain Sensitivity and Pain Catastrophizing Are Associated With Persistent Pain and Disability After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Steven Z George; Clinton J Devin; Stephen T Wegener; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Psychological predictors of quality of life and functional outcome in patients undergoing elective surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Authors:  Arthur Wagner; Youssef Shiban; Corinna Wagner; Kaywan Aftahy; Ann-Kathrin Joerger; Bernhard Meyer; Ehab Shiban
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS) a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  James Greenwood; Alison McGregor; Fiona Jones; Michael Hurley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Quality of life and disability: can they be improved by active postoperative rehabilitation after spinal fusion surgery in patients with spondylolisthesis? A randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Outi Ilves; Arja Häkkinen; Joost Dekker; Liisa Pekkanen; Kirsi Piitulainen; Salme Järvenpää; Ilkka Marttinen; Kimmo Vihtonen; Marko H Neva
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Influence of psychosocial distress in the results of elective lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Vivian Amaral; Luis Marchi; Heber Martim; Rodrigo Amaral; Joes Nogueira-Neto; Ellen Pierro; Leonardo Oliveira; Etevaldo Coutinho; Fernando Marcelino; Nicholai Faulhaber; Rubens Jensen; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

10.  Evidence base and future research directions in the management of low back pain.

Authors:  Allan Abbott
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.