Literature DB >> 15937676

Lumbar spinal fusion patients' demands to the primary health sector: evaluation of three rehabilitation protocols. A prospective randomized study.

Rikke Soegaard1, Finn B Christensen, Ida Lauerberg, Ida Lauersen, Cody E Bünger.   

Abstract

Very few studies have investigated the effects or costs of rehabilitation regimens following lumbar spinal fusion. The effectiveness of in-hospital rehabilitation regimens has substantial impact on patients' demands in the primary health care sector. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-articulated demands to the primary health care sector following lumbar spinal fusion and three different in-hospital rehabilitation regimens in a prospective, randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. Ninety patients were randomized 3 months post lumbar spinal fusion to either a 'video' group (one-time oral instruction by a physiotherapist and patients were then issued a video for home exercise), or a 'café' group (video regimen with the addition of three café meetings with other fusion-operated patients) or a 'training' group (exercise therapy; physiotherapist-guided; two times a week for 8 weeks). Register data of service utilization in the primary health care sector were collected from the time of randomization through 24 months postsurgery. Costs of in-hospital protocols were estimated and the service utilization in the primary health care sector and its cost were analyzed. A significant difference (P=0.023) in number of contacts was found among groups at 2-year follow-up. Within the periods of 3-6 months and 7-12 months postoperatively, the experimental groups required less than half the amount of care within the primary health care sector as compared to the video group (P=0.001 and P=0.008). The incremental costs of the café regimen respectively, the training regimen were compensated by cost savings in the primary health care sector, at ratios of 4.70 (95% CI 4.64; 4.77) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.68; 1.72). This study concludes that a low-cost biopsychosocial rehabilitation regimen significantly reduces service utilization in the primary health care sector as compared to the usual regimen and a training exercise regimen. The results stress the importance of a cognitive element of coping in a rehabilitation program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937676      PMCID: PMC3489345          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0884-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Chronic low-back pain: what does cognitive coping skills training add to operant behavioral treatment? Results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A M Kole-Snijders; J W Vlaeyen; M E Goossens; M P Rutten-van Mölken; P H Heuts; G van Breukelen; H van Eek
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-12

2.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Authors:  M W van Tulder; R Ostelo; J W Vlaeyen; S J Linton; S J Morley; W J Assendelft
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis--a prospective randomized study: part 2.

Authors:  H Möller; R Hedlund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis--a prospective randomized study: part 1.

Authors:  H Möller; R Hedlund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.

Authors:  P Fritzell; O Hägg; P Wessberg; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001.

Authors:  Andreas Maetzel; Linda Li
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  [Gender-specific aspects in chronic low back pain rehabilitation].

Authors:  B Schmidt; P Kolip; B Greitemann
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.113

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  J Guzmán; R Esmail; K Karjalainen; A Malmivaara; E Irvin; C Bombardier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

10.  Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jan S Skouen; Astrid L Grasdal; Ellen M H Haldorsen; Holger Ursin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Health economic evaluation in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic literature review anno 2005.

Authors:  Rikke Soegaard; Finn B Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of an RCT in rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a low-cost, behavioural approach is cost-effective over individual exercise therapy.

Authors:  Rikke Søgaard; Cody E Bünger; Ida Laurberg; Finn B Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Investigating and predicting early lumbar spine surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Saddam F Kanaan; Paul M Arnold; Douglas C Burton; Hung-Wen Yeh; Lindsay Loyd; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2015

5.  Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Clinton J Devin; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Steven Z George; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Simona Ferrante; Marco Teli; Barbara Rocca; Calogero Foti; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar surgery in work-related chronic low back pain: can a continuum of care enhance outcomes?

Authors:  Tom G Mayer; Robert J Gatchel; Emily Brede; Brian R Theodore
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Quality of life and disability: can they be improved by active postoperative rehabilitation after spinal fusion surgery in patients with spondylolisthesis? A randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Outi Ilves; Arja Häkkinen; Joost Dekker; Liisa Pekkanen; Kirsi Piitulainen; Salme Järvenpää; Ilkka Marttinen; Kimmo Vihtonen; Marko H Neva
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Physiotherapy rehabilitation following lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Alison Rushton; Gillian Eveleigh; Emma-Jane Petherick; Nicola Heneghan; Rosalie Bennett; Gill James; Chris Wright
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.