Literature DB >> 11784277

Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during physical therapy.

Antonius Rohlmann1, Friedmar Graichen, Georg Bergmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Modified internal spinal fixation devices allow the measurement of the forces and moments acting on the implants. The aim of this study was to measure the loads on internal fixation devices for selected body positions and movements during physical therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Loads on an internal spinal fixation device were measured in 10 patients with degenerative instability or compression fractures using a telemeterized implant.
RESULTS: Relatively low implant loads were found in the recumbent body positions. Most exercises performed in a lying position caused implant loads less than that measured for standing and are therefore not likely to increase the risk of screw breakage. Fixation device loads were lower for sitting relaxed than for standing. The highest implant loads (128% of the value for standing) were measured during walking. Standing up, sitting down, and lateral bending and axial rotation of the upper body while standing led to fixation device loads between 111% and 120% related to the value for standing. Even higher fixation device loads were measured for ventral flexion and extension of the upper body while standing. Kneeling on hands and knees, and flexing and extending the back in this position, caused implant loads that were lower than for standing. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Standing up, sitting down, and lateral bending and axial rotation of the upper body while standing may slightly increase the risk of pedicle screw breakage, whereas ventral flexion and extension of the upper body while standing may increase this risk considerably if the region bridged by the implant is distracted (the distance between upper and lower screws was increased) during surgery. However, walking is the exercise that plays the major role concerning pedicle screw breakage because it causes the highest bending moments of all exercises studied and it loads the fixation devices most frequently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11784277     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  7 in total

1.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of the intra-abdominal pressure and the center of segmental body mass on the lumbar spine mechanics - a computational parametric study.

Authors:  W M Park; S Wang; Y H Kim; K B Wood; J A Sim; G Li
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Simona Ferrante; Marco Teli; Barbara Rocca; Calogero Foti; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Physiotherapy rehabilitation following lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Alison Rushton; Gillian Eveleigh; Emma-Jane Petherick; Nicola Heneghan; Rosalie Bennett; Gill James; Chris Wright
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Spinal loads during post-operative physiotherapeutic exercises.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Verena Schwachmeyer; Friedmar Graichen; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Incomplete insertion of pedicle screws in a standard construct reduces the fatigue life: A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Yo-Lun Chu; Chia-Hsien Chen; Fon-Yih Tsuang; Chang-Jung Chiang; Yueh Wu; Yi-Jie Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.