Zhanlian Feng1, Hye-Young Jung, Brad Wright, Vincent Mor. 1. *RTI International, Waltham, MA †Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, RI ‡Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY §Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing use of hospital observation care continues unabated despite growing concerns from Medicare beneficiaries, patient advocacy groups, providers, and policy makers. Unlike inpatient stays, outpatient observation stays are subject to 20% coinsurance and do not count toward the 3-day stay required for Medicare coverage of skilled nursing facility (SNF) care. Despite the policy relevance, we know little about where patients originate or their discharge disposition following observation stays, making it difficult to understand the scope of unintended consequences for beneficiaries, particularly those needing postacute care in a SNF. OBJECTIVE: To determine Medicare beneficiaries' location immediately preceding and following an observation stay. RESEARCH DESIGN: We linked 100% Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient claims data with the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessments. We then flagged observation stays and conducted a descriptive claims-based analysis of where beneficiaries were immediately before and after their observation stay. RESULTS: Most patients came from (92%) and were discharged to (90%) the community. Of >1 million total observation stays in 2009, just 7537 (0.75%) were at risk for high out-of-pocket expenses related to postobservation SNF care. Beneficiaries with longer observation stays were more likely to be discharged to SNF. CONCLUSIONS: With few at risk for being denied Medicare SNF coverage due to observation care, high out-of-pocket costs resulting from Medicare outpatient coinsurance requirements for observation stays seem to be of greater concern than limitations on Medicare coverage of postacute care. However, future research should explore how observation stay policy might decrease appropriate SNF use.
BACKGROUND: Growing use of hospital observation care continues unabated despite growing concerns from Medicare beneficiaries, patient advocacy groups, providers, and policy makers. Unlike inpatient stays, outpatient observation stays are subject to 20% coinsurance and do not count toward the 3-day stay required for Medicare coverage of skilled nursing facility (SNF) care. Despite the policy relevance, we know little about where patients originate or their discharge disposition following observation stays, making it difficult to understand the scope of unintended consequences for beneficiaries, particularly those needing postacute care in a SNF. OBJECTIVE: To determine Medicare beneficiaries' location immediately preceding and following an observation stay. RESEARCH DESIGN: We linked 100% Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient claims data with the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessments. We then flagged observation stays and conducted a descriptive claims-based analysis of where beneficiaries were immediately before and after their observation stay. RESULTS: Most patients came from (92%) and were discharged to (90%) the community. Of >1 million total observation stays in 2009, just 7537 (0.75%) were at risk for high out-of-pocket expenses related to postobservation SNF care. Beneficiaries with longer observation stays were more likely to be discharged to SNF. CONCLUSIONS: With few at risk for being denied Medicare SNF coverage due to observation care, high out-of-pocket costs resulting from Medicare outpatient coinsurance requirements for observation stays seem to be of greater concern than limitations on Medicare coverage of postacute care. However, future research should explore how observation stay policy might decrease appropriate SNF use.
Authors: Ann M Sheehy; Ben Graf; Sreedevi Gangireddy; Robert Hoffman; Mary Ehlenbach; Cynthia Heidke; Sheilah Fields; Barbara Liegel; Elizabeth A Jacobs Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Christopher W Baugh; Arjun K Venkatesh; Joshua A Hilton; Peter A Samuel; Jeremiah D Schuur; J Stephen Bohan Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Andrea Romero; Carlene Brown; Ferdinand Richards; Patricia Collier; Susan Jentz; Mark Michelman; Karen Davison Journal: Prof Case Manag Date: 2009 May-Jun
Authors: Benjamin C Silver; Momotazur Rahman; Brad Wright; Richard Besdine; Pedro Gozalo; Vincent Mor Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jay S Lee; Joceline V Vu; Anthony L Edelman; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Chad M Brummett; Michael J Englesbe; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Kumar Dharmarajan; Li Qin; Maggie Bierlein; Jennie E S Choi; Zhenqiu Lin; Nihar R Desai; Erica S Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-06-20