Literature DB >> 23835822

Impact of individual and team features of patient safety climate: a survey in family practices.

Barbara Hoffmann1, Carolin Miessner, Zeycan Albay, Jakob Schröber, Katrin Weppler, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Corina Güthlin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Knowledge about safety climate is fundamental to improving patient safety in health care organizations. Because individual and organizational factors influence the safety climate, we conducted a health care survey of German family practices so we could analyze the impact of the professional group, the professional experience of practice staff, and practice characteristics on perceptions of the safety climate.
METHODS: We wrote to health care assistants and doctors in 1,800 randomly selected family practices in Germany and asked them to complete a newly developed and validated Frankfurt Patient Safety Climate Questionnaire. We conducted a descriptive analyses of items and climate factors, as well as regression analysis, to identify potential predictors of the safety climate in family practice.
RESULTS: The response rate from the participating practices was 36.1%. Safety climate was perceived to be generally positive with the exception of the factors of error management and perception of the causes of errors. We discovered that whether or not the entire team had taken part in the survey had a positive influence on most factors. Doctors had more positive perceptions of 4 of 7 factors addressed to both professions. Male participants and doctors showed the most willingness to admit they had made an error.
CONCLUSIONS: Though the safety climate in German family practices was positive overall, health care professionals' use of incident reporting and a system's approach to errors was fairly rare. When evaluating the safety climate in primary health care practices, respondents' individual characteristics, as well as organizational features, should be taken into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family practice; health care survey; patient safety; primary health care; safety climate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835822      PMCID: PMC3704496          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  29 in total

1.  Human error: models and management.

Authors:  J Reason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Assessing the cultures of medical group practices.

Authors:  Ann Curoe; John Kralewski; Amer Kaissi
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

3.  Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution.

Authors:  David T Huang; Gilles Clermont; J Bryan Sexton; Crystal A Karlo; Rachel G Miller; Lisa A Weissfeld; Kathy M Rowan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries.

Authors:  Cathy Schoen; Robin Osborn; Phuong Trang Huynh; Michelle Doty; Jordon Peugh; Kinga Zapert
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Healthcare climate: a framework for measuring and improving patient safety.

Authors:  Dov Zohar; Yael Livne; Orly Tenne-Gazit; Hanna Admi; Yoel Donchin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Measuring perceptions of safety climate in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carl de Wet; Paul Johnson; Robert Mash; Alex McConnachie; Paul Bowie
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting: the safety attitudes questionnaire--ambulatory version.

Authors:  Isitri Modak; J Bryan Sexton; Thomas R Lux; Robert L Helmreich; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Saying 'goodbye' to single-handed practices; what do patients and staff lose or gain?

Authors:  Pieter van den Hombergh; Yvonne Engels; Henk van den Hoogen; Jan van Doremalen; Wil van den Bosch; Richard Grol
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Safety Climate Survey: reliability of results from a multicenter ICU survey.

Authors:  M E Kho; J M Carbone; J Lucas; D J Cook
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

10.  Patient safety culture in primary care: developing a theoretical framework for practical use.

Authors:  Susan Kirk; Dianne Parker; Tanya Claridge; Aneez Esmail; Martin Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  In this issue: a diversified portfolio.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Muna Habib Al Lawati; Sarah Dennis; Stephanie D Short; Nadia Noor Abdulhadi
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Assessment of patient safety culture in primary care setting, Al-Mukala, Yemen.

Authors:  Hana H Webair; Salwa S Al-Assani; Reema H Al-Haddad; Wafa H Al-Shaeeb; Manal A Bin Selm; Abdulla S Alyamani
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Safety climate in English general practices: workload pressures may compromise safety.

Authors:  Brian G Bell; David Reeves; Kate Marsden; Anthony Avery
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Measuring patient safety culture in maternal and child health institutions in China: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Weiwei Liu; Huifeng Shi; Chaojie Liu; Yan Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Perceived safety climate in Irish primary care settings-a comparison with Scotland and England.

Authors:  Ciara Curran; Sinéad Lydon; Maureen E Kelly; Andrew W Murphy; Caoimhe Madden; Paul O'Connor
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Safety in primary care (SAP-C): a randomised, controlled feasibility study in two different healthcare systems.

Authors:  Caoimhe Madden; Sinéad Lydon; Margaret E Cupples; Nigel D Hart; Ciara Curran; Andrew W Murphy; Paul O'Connor
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.