Literature DB >> 20860593

Measuring perceptions of safety climate in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Carl de Wet1, Paul Johnson, Robert Mash, Alex McConnachie, Paul Bowie.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Building a strong and positive safety culture in health care teams and organizations is essential for patient safety. Measuring individual perceptions of safety climate is an integral part of this process. Evidence of the successful application and potential usefulness of this approach is increasingly available for secondary care settings but little is known about the safety climate in UK primary care. We therefore aimed to measure perceptions of safety climate in primary care. Further aims were to determine whether perceptions varied significantly between practice teams and according to specific participant and practice characteristics.
METHOD: We undertook a cross-sectional, anonymous postal questionnaire survey of randomly selected west of Scotland primary care teams. Safety climate mean scores with standard deviations were calculated for respondents, practice teams and the region.
RESULTS: A total of 563 (84%) team members from 49 practices (24.5%) returned questionnaires. The overall safety climate mean score was 5.48 (0.78). Significant differences in safety climate perceptions were found at the practice team level (P < 0.001) and for specific characteristics: respondents' years of experience, whether they were community or practice based, their professional roles and practices' training status. Practice managers and general practitioners perceived the safety climate more positive than other respondents (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This was the first known attempt to measure perceptions of safety climate in UK primary care with a validated instrument specifically developed for that purpose. Reported perceptions of the prevailing safety climate were generally positive. This may reflect ongoing efforts to build a strong safety culture in primary care or alternatively point to an overestimation of the effectiveness of local safety systems. The significant variation in perception between certain staff groups has potential safety implications and may have to be aligned for a positive and strong safety culture to be built. While safety climate measurement has various benefits at the individual, practice team and regional level, further research of its association with specific safety outcomes is required.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20860593     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01537.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  19 in total

1.  Improving patient safety culture in general practice: an interview study.

Authors:  Natasha J Verbakel; Antoinette A de Bont; Theo J M Verheij; Cordula Wagner; Dorien L M Zwart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Effects of patient safety culture interventions on incident reporting in general practice: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Natasha J Verbakel; Maaike Langelaan; Theo J M Verheij; Cordula Wagner; Dorien L M Zwart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Results of a community-based survey of construction safety climate for Hispanic workers.

Authors:  Luz S Marin; Manuel Cifuentes; Cora Roelofs
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-07-06

4.  Impact of individual and team features of patient safety climate: a survey in family practices.

Authors:  Barbara Hoffmann; Carolin Miessner; Zeycan Albay; Jakob Schröber; Katrin Weppler; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Corina Güthlin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Muna Habib Al Lawati; Sarah Dennis; Stephanie D Short; Nadia Noor Abdulhadi
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist.

Authors:  Paul Bowie; John McKay; Moya Kelly
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Safety climate in English general practices: workload pressures may compromise safety.

Authors:  Brian G Bell; David Reeves; Kate Marsden; Anthony Avery
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Can we quantify harm in general practice records? An assessment of precision and power using computer simulation.

Authors:  Carl de Wet; Paul Johnson; Catherine O'Donnell; Paul Bowie
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Good practice statements on safe laboratory testing: A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

Authors:  Paul Bowie; Eleanor Forrest; Julie Price; Wim Verstappen; David Cunningham; Lyn Halley; Suzanne Grant; Moya Kelly; John Mckay
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  The safety climate in primary care (SAP-C) study: study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Sinéad Lydon; Margaret E Cupples; Nigel Hart; Andrew W Murphy; Aileen Faherty; Paul O'Connor
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.