Literature DB >> 23835616

Feedback training for facial image comparison.

David White1, Richard I Kemp, Rob Jenkins, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

People are typically poor at matching the identity of unfamiliar faces from photographs. This observation has broad implications for face matching in operational settings (e.g., border control). Here, we report significant improvements in face matching ability following feedback training. In Experiment 1, we show cumulative improvement in performance on a standard test of face matching ability when participants were provided with trial-by-trial feedback. More important, Experiment 2 shows that training benefits can generalize to novel, widely varying, unfamiliar face images for which no feedback is provided. The transfer effect specifically benefited participants who had performed poorly on an initial screening test. These findings are discussed in the context of existing literature on unfamiliar face matching and perceptual training. Given the reliability of the performance enhancement and its generalization to diverse image sets, we suggest that feedback training may be useful for face matching in occupational settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23835616     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0475-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mental representations of familiar faces.

Authors:  A Mike Burton; Rob Jenkins; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-06-14

2.  Robust representations for face recognition: the power of averages.

Authors:  A Mike Burton; Rob Jenkins; Peter J B Hancock; David White
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  Fortysomething: recognizing faces at one's 25th reunion.

Authors:  M Bruck; P Cavanagh; S J Ceci
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-05

5.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test.

Authors:  A Mike Burton; David White; Allan McNeill
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

6.  Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain; Allison B Sekuler; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The other-race effect does not rely on memory: Evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; David White; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Variability in photos of the same face.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; David White; Xandra Van Montfort; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-03

9.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  19 in total

1.  The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Kay L Ritchie; Tessa R Flack; Elizabeth A Fuller; Charlotte Cartledge; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Learning faces: similar comparator faces do not improve performance.

Authors:  Scott P Jones; Dominic M Dwyer; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Passport officers' errors in face matching.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; Michael Matheson; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software.

Authors:  David White; James D Dunn; Alexandra C Schmid; Richard I Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Face Recognition by Metropolitan Police Super-Recognisers.

Authors:  David J Robertson; Eilidh Noyes; Andrew J Dowsett; Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks.

Authors:  Anna K Bobak; Peter J B Hancock; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-10-20

7.  Learning context and the other-race effect: Strategies for improving face recognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Cavazos; Eilidh Noyes; Alice J O'Toole
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Solving the Border Control Problem: Evidence of Enhanced Face Matching in Individuals with Extraordinary Face Recognition Skills.

Authors:  Anna Katarzyna Bobak; Andrew James Dowsett; Sarah Bate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Super-Memorizers Are Not Super-Recognizers.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Sebastien Miellet; Anna M Dzieciol; Boris Nikolai Konrad; Martin Dresler; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.