Literature DB >> 21812594

The other-race effect does not rely on memory: Evidence from a matching task.

Ahmed M Megreya1, David White, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

Viewers are typically better at remembering faces from their own race than from other races; however, it is not yet established whether this effect is due to memorial or perceptual processes. In this study, UK and Egyptian viewers were given a simultaneous face-matching task, in which the target faces were presented upright or upside down. As with previous research using face memory tasks, participants were worse at matching other-race faces than own-race faces and showed a stronger face inversion effect for own-race faces. However, subjects' performance on own and other-race faces was highly correlated. These data provide strong evidence that difficulty in perceptual encoding of unfamiliar faces contributes substantially to the other-race effect and that accounts based entirely on memory cannot capture the full data. Implications for forensic settings are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21812594     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.575228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  15 in total

1.  Feedback training for facial image comparison.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

2.  Generalization across view in face memory and face matching.

Authors:  Alejandro J Estudillo; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-24

3.  Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software.

Authors:  David White; James D Dunn; Alexandra C Schmid; Richard I Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Feature-by-feature comparison and holistic processing in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: implications for criminal investigation and security.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

6.  Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer; Jerrica Mulgrew; Michael G Reynolds
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Solving the Border Control Problem: Evidence of Enhanced Face Matching in Individuals with Extraordinary Face Recognition Skills.

Authors:  Anna Katarzyna Bobak; Andrew James Dowsett; Sarah Bate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How Well Do Computer-Generated Faces Tap Face Expertise?

Authors:  Kate Crookes; Louise Ewing; Ju-Dith Gildenhuys; Nadine Kloth; William G Hayward; Matt Oxner; Stephen Pond; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hyper-realistic face masks: a new challenge in person identification.

Authors:  Jet Gabrielle Sanders; Yoshiyuki Ueda; Kazusa Minemoto; Eilidh Noyes; Sakiko Yoshikawa; Rob Jenkins
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-10-25

10.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.