Literature DB >> 23835569

Computer-aided orbital wall defects treatment by individual design ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene implants.

Marcin Kozakiewicz1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Despite of well-known advantages of high molecular weight polyethylene (Medpor, Synpore) in orbital reconstructions, the thickness of those implants significantly exceeds 0.5 mm and precise modification of thickness is limited. The aim of this study was to present the application of a self-developed method of treatment orbital wall fracture by custom implant made of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE). MATERIAL AND
METHOD: First, the test of influence of sterilization process upon implant deformation was performed (autoclaving, ethylene oxide, gas plasma, irradiation). Next, ten cases for delayed surgical treatment of orbital fracture were included into this study (7 males, 3 females). Based on CT scan and mirrored technique, a CAD model of virtual implant for repairing orbital wall was made. Then, an implant was manufactured with a computer numerical controlled milling machine from UHMW-PE block, sterilized and used during a surgical procedure. Clinically used implants had thickness from 0.2 to 4.0 mm.
RESULTS: The best method of sterilization is ethylene oxide process, and the worst is autoclaving. In this series of delayed surgical cases, functional results of orbital surgery are worse than in simpler, early treated cases, but long-term subsidence of diplopia is noticeable [10% poor results]. The results of the treatment depend on the initial level of diplopia where severe initial diplopia to be corrected requires thicker implants (p < 0.01). It also leads to longer surgical procedures (p < 0.01), but prolongation of the surgery had no negative influence upon results of any investigated follow-up examinations. Obviously, the orbital destruction intensity is related to injury-evoked initial diplopia but it also influences whole results of treatment up to 12 months post-op. Interesting result is presented by the relation of maximal implant thickness to 12-month diplopia evaluation. Thicker implants used result in lower residual diplopia (p < 0.05). This is important because of the correlation between the higher orbital destruction intensity with a thicker UHMW-PE implant (p < 0.05) applied in this series.
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene implants enable precise reconstructions of orbital wall. One should not be afraid of a significant eye globe reposition caused by these thickness modulated implants, as such repositioning is essential for an efficient correction of enophthalmos.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD; CAM; Orbit; Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835569     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  Radio-opaque polyethylene for personalized craniomaxillofacial implants.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Leszek Olbrzymek; Ludomir Stefanczyk; Marek Olszycki; Piotr Komorowski; Bogdan Walkowiak; Bartłomiej Konieczny; Michał Krasowski; Jerzy Sokołowski
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of head positioning during cone-beam CT imaging on the accuracy of virtual 3D models.

Authors:  Maureen van Eijnatten; Jan Wolff; Ruben Pauwels; Kalle Karhu; Ari Hietanen; Henry der Sarkissian; Juha H Koivisto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Shivam Patel; Tom Shokri; Kasra Ziai; Jessyka G Lighthall
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-24

4.  Restoration of the inferomedial orbital strut using a standardized three-dimensional printing implant.

Authors:  Jun Hyeok Kim; In-Gyu Lee; Jeong-Seok Lee; Deuk Young Oh; Young Joon Jun; Jong Won Rhie; Jin-Hyung Shim; Suk-Ho Moon
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Improved accuracy of mandible geometry reconstruction at the stage of data processing and modeling.

Authors:  Grzegorz Budzik; Paweł Turek
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 1.430

6.  Custom-Made Zirconium Dioxide Implants for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Tomasz Gmyrek; Radosław Zajdel; Bartłomiej Konieczny
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Management of orbital fractures: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Jennings R Boyette; John D Pemberton; Juliana Bonilla-Velez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-17

8.  Assessment of Differences in the Dimensions of Mandible Condyle Models in Fan- versus Cone-Beam Computer Tomography Acquisition.

Authors:  Bartosz Bielecki-Kowalski; Marcin Kozakiewicz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.