Literature DB >> 31852015

Restoration of the inferomedial orbital strut using a standardized three-dimensional printing implant.

Jun Hyeok Kim1, In-Gyu Lee2, Jeong-Seok Lee2, Deuk Young Oh1, Young Joon Jun1, Jong Won Rhie1, Jin-Hyung Shim2, Suk-Ho Moon1.   

Abstract

The inferomedial orbital strut (IOS) is the thin bony junction of the orbital medial wall and floor. Its fracture is common and leads to serious complications, including enophthalmos, globe dystopia and diplopia. However, anatomical restoration of the IOS is challenging owing to reduced structural support; sound anatomical background and accurate implants are therefore essential. The aim of the present study was to incorporate data from cadaveric orbit anatomy into three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and to reconstruct the complex orbital fracture elaborately. After averaging the data from computed tomography (CT) images of 100 adult cadavers, the dimensions of the IOS were extracted, and a tangent sphere was created using a computer-aided design program. The curves were compared with the CT data of 10 adult patients from the simulation test. Based on these data, a standardized 3D implant, 1.15 mm thick, was designed using polycaprolactone. The implant was placed in five patients with complex orbital fractures. The radius of the sphere in contact with the orbit, measuring 33.54 mm, was confirmed to be appropriate. A comparison between the normal side volume (V0) and the postoperative volume (Vpost ) showed that they were statistically similar. Furthermore, a comparison between V0 and the preoperative volume (Vpre ), and Vpost compared with Vpre also showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). On follow-up, the preoperative ocular symptoms were resolved. The orbital data obtained from 100 cadavers provided standardized orbital anatomy, and 3D printed implants were created. The implants were anatomically accurate with regard to the orbital cavity and adequately covered the simulation model. The implant also showed satisfactory results when applied clinically in actual patients.
© 2019 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printed implants; computer-aided design; inferomedial orbital strut; orbital fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31852015      PMCID: PMC7163695          DOI: 10.1111/joa.13136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  40 in total

1.  Orbital decompression.

Authors:  D R Jordan; R L Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  Anatomical 3-dimensional pre-bent titanium implant for orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Marc C Metzger; Ralf Schön; Nils Weyer; Amir Rafii; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Bradley E Strong
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  Classification and surgical management of orbital fractures: experience with 111 orbital reconstructions.

Authors:  S Manolidis; B H Weeks; M Kirby; M Scarlett; L Hollier
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Retrospective analysis of 301 patients with orbital floor fracture.

Authors:  Davina Bartoli; Maria Teresa Fadda; Andrea Battisti; Andrea Cassoni; Mario Pagnoni; Emiliano Riccardi; Marcello Sanzi; Valentino Valentini
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The accuracy of patient specific implant prebented with 3D-printed rapid prototype model for orbital wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Young Chul Kim; Woo Shik Jeong; Tae-Kyung Park; Jong Woo Choi; Kyung S Koh; Tae Suk Oh
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  An analysis of pure blowout fractures and associated ocular symptoms.

Authors:  Jun Woo Shin; Jin Soo Lim; Gyeol Yoo; Jun Hee Byeon
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  A Novel Method of Orbital Floor Reconstruction Using Virtual Planning, 3-Dimensional Printing, and Autologous Bone.

Authors:  Maarten Vehmeijer; Maureen van Eijnatten; Niels Liberton; Jan Wolff
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Reconstructing a Traumatic Empty Orbit: Principles, Difficulties of Treatment, and Literature Review.

Authors:  Panagiotis Stathopoulos; Philip Ameerally
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Three dimensional reconstruction of late post traumatic orbital wall defects by customized implants using CAD-CAM, 3D stereolithographic models: A case report.

Authors:  Vignesh U; Divya Mehrotra; Vaibhav Anand; Debraj Howlader
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 10.  Implantable Polymeric Drug Delivery Devices: Classification, Manufacture, Materials, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Sarah A Stewart; Juan Domínguez-Robles; Ryan F Donnelly; Eneko Larrañeta
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 4.329

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  3D Printing in Eye Care.

Authors:  Ryan D Larochelle; Scott E Mann; Cristos Ifantides
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.