Literature DB >> 23835171

Malic enzyme and malolactic enzyme pathways are functionally linked but independently regulated in Lactobacillus casei BL23.

José María Landete1, Sergi Ferrer, Vicente Monedero, Manuel Zúñiga.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus casei is the only lactic acid bacterium in which two pathways for l-malate degradation have been described: the malolactic enzyme (MLE) and the malic enzyme (ME) pathways. Whereas the ME pathway enables L. casei to grow on l-malate, MLE does not support growth. The mle gene cluster consists of three genes encoding MLE (mleS), the putative l-malate transporter MleT, and the putative regulator MleR. The mae gene cluster consists of four genes encoding ME (maeE), the putative transporter MaeP, and the two-component system MaeKR. Since both pathways compete for the same substrate, we sought to determine whether they are coordinately regulated and their role in l-malate utilization as a carbon source. Transcriptional analyses revealed that the mle and mae genes are independently regulated and showed that MleR acts as an activator and requires internalization of l-malate to induce the expression of mle genes. Notwithstanding, both l-malate transporters were required for maximal l-malate uptake, although only an mleT mutation caused a growth defect on l-malate, indicating its crucial role in l-malate metabolism. However, inactivation of MLE resulted in higher growth rates and higher final optical densities on l-malate. The limited growth on l-malate of the wild-type strain was correlated to a rapid degradation of the available l-malate to l-lactate, which cannot be further metabolized. Taken together, our results indicate that L. casei l-malate metabolism is not optimized for utilization of l-malate as a carbon source but for deacidification of the medium by conversion of l-malate into l-lactate via MLE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835171      PMCID: PMC3754186          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01177-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  31 in total

1.  Stimulatory Effect of Malo-Lactic Fermentation on the Growth Rate of Leuconostoc oenos.

Authors:  G J Pilone; R E Kunkee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Incompatibility of Lactobacillus Vectors with Replicons Derived from Small Cryptic Lactobacillus Plasmids and Segregational Instability of the Introduced Vectors.

Authors:  M Posno; R J Leer; N van Luijk; M J F van Giezen; P T H M Heuvelmans; B C Lokman; P H Pouwels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Single-crossover integration in the Lactobacillus sake chromosome and insertional inactivation of the ptsI and lacL genes.

Authors:  L Leloup; S D Ehrlich; M Zagorec; F Morel-Deville
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Chemiosmotic energy from malolactic fermentation.

Authors:  D J Cox; T Henick-Kling
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine.

Authors:  A Lonvaud-Funel
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1999 Jul-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress.

Authors:  Jeff R Broadbent; Rebecca L Larsen; Virginia Deibel; James L Steele
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Secretion of biologically active murine interleukin-10 by Lactococcus lactis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Enzyme Microb Technol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.493

8.  Characterization of mleR, a positive regulator of malolactic fermentation and part of the acid tolerance response in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  André Lemme; Helena Sztajer; Irene Wagner-Döbler
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Sugar-glycerol cofermentations in lactobacilli: the fate of lactate.

Authors:  M Veiga da Cunha; M A Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Oxygen dependent lactate utilization by Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  M G Murphy; L O'Connor; D Walsh; S Condon
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.552

View more
  8 in total

1.  An L-Fucose Operon in the Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Is Involved in Adaptation to Gastrointestinal Conditions.

Authors:  Jimmy E Becerra; María J Yebra; Vicente Monedero
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Streptococcus pyogenes malate degradation pathway links pH regulation and virulence.

Authors:  Elyse Paluscio; Michael G Caparon
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  The malate sensing two-component system MaeKR is a non-canonical class of sensory complex for C4-dicarboxylates.

Authors:  L Miguel-Romero; P Casino; J M Landete; V Monedero; M Zúñiga; A Marina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Global Transcriptomic Analysis and Function Identification of Malolactic Enzyme Pathway of Lactobacillus paracasei L9 in Response to Bile Stress.

Authors:  Xiayin Ma; Guohong Wang; Zhengyuan Zhai; Pengyu Zhou; Yanling Hao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Biovalorization of Market Surplus Bread for Development of Probiotic-Fermented Potential Functional Beverages.

Authors:  Thuy-Linh Nguyen; Mingzhan Toh; Yuyun Lu; Sebastian Ku; Shao-Quan Liu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-18

6.  Characterisation of putative lactate synthetic pathways of Coxiella burnetii.

Authors:  Janine Hofmann; Mebratu A Bitew; Miku Kuba; David P De Souza; Hayley J Newton; Fiona M Sansom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  GABA Production in Lactococcus lactis Is Enhanced by Arginine and Co-addition of Malate.

Authors:  Valérie Laroute; Chonthicha Yasaro; Waranya Narin; Roberto Mazzoli; Enrica Pessione; Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet; Pascal Loubière
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  A metabolic reconstruction of Lactobacillus reuteri JCM 1112 and analysis of its potential as a cell factory.

Authors:  Thordis Kristjansdottir; Elleke F Bosma; Filipe Branco Dos Santos; Emre Özdemir; Markus J Herrgård; Lucas França; Bruno Ferreira; Alex T Nielsen; Steinn Gudmundsson
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.328

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.