Literature DB >> 20207759

Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress.

Jeff R Broadbent1, Rebecca L Larsen, Virginia Deibel, James L Steele.   

Abstract

This study investigated features of the acid tolerance response (ATR) in Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334. To optimize ATR induction, cells were acid adapted for 10 or 20 min at different pH values (range, 3.0 to 5.0) and then acid challenged at pH 2.0. Adaptation over a broad range of pHs improved acid tolerance, but the highest survival was noted in cells acid adapted for 10 or 20 min at pH 4.5. Analysis of cytoplasmic membrane fatty acids (CMFAs) in acid-adapted cells showed that they had significantly (P < 0.05) higher total percentages of saturated and cyclopropane fatty acids than did control cells. Specifically, large increases in the percentages of C(14:0), C(16:1n(9)), C(16:0), and C(19:0(11c)) were noted in the CMFAs of acid-adapted and acid-adapted, acid-challenged cells, while C(18:1n(9)) and C(18:1n(11)) showed the greatest decrease. Comparison of the transcriptome from control cells (grown at pH 6.0) against that from cells acid adapted for 20 min at pH 4.5 indicated that acid adaption invoked a stringent-type response that was accompanied by other functions which likely helped these cells resist acid damage, including malolactic fermentation and intracellular accumulation of His. Validation of microarray data was provided by experiments that showed that L. casei survival at pH 2.5 was improved at least 100-fold by chemical induction of the stringent response or by the addition of 30 mM malate or 30 mM histidine to the acid challenge medium. To our knowledge, this is the first report that intracellular histidine accumulation may be involved in bacterial acid resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207759      PMCID: PMC2863488          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01618-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  44 in total

1.  Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response.

Authors:  R J Lambert; M Stratford
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  The global regulator H-NS acts directly on the transpososome to promote Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  Simon J Wardle; Michelle O'Carroll; Keith M Derbyshire; David B Haniford
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  (p)ppGpp: still magical?

Authors:  Katarzyna Potrykus; Michael Cashel
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Acid tolerance response and survival by oral bacteria.

Authors:  G Svensäter; U B Larsson; E C Greif; D G Cvitkovitch; I R Hamilton
Journal:  Oral Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1997-10

5.  Gas chromatography analysis of cellular fatty acids and neutral monosaccharides in the identification of lactobacilli.

Authors:  A F Rizzo; H Korkeala; I Mononen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Rapid procedure for acid adaptation of oral lactic-acid bacteria and further characterization of the response.

Authors:  Y Ma; T M Curran; R E Marquis
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Mutations in the spoT gene of Salmonella typhimurium: effects on his operon expression.

Authors:  K E Rudd; B R Bochner; M Cashel; J R Roth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus casei: insights into their niche-associated evolution.

Authors:  Hui Cai; Rebecca Thompson; Mateo F Budinich; Jeff R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 9.  Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Maarten van de Guchte; Pascale Serror; Christian Chervaux; Tamara Smokvina; Stanislav D Ehrlich; Emmanuelle Maguin
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

10.  Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Lactobacillus casei strains isolated from different ecological niches suggests frequent recombination and niche specificity.

Authors:  Hui Cai; Beatriz T Rodríguez; Wei Zhang; Jeff R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.777

View more
  61 in total

1.  Proteomics and transcriptomics characterization of bile stress response in probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG.

Authors:  Kerttu Koskenniemi; Kati Laakso; Johanna Koponen; Matti Kankainen; Dario Greco; Petri Auvinen; Kirsi Savijoki; Tuula A Nyman; Anu Surakka; Tuomas Salusjärvi; Willem M de Vos; Soile Tynkkynen; Nisse Kalkkinen; Pekka Varmanen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Whole genome and acid stress comparative transcriptome analysis of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZDY2013.

Authors:  Lingling Peng; Kui Zhao; Shufang Chen; Zhongyue Ren; Hua Wei; Cuixiang Wan
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Transcriptional and metabolomic consequences of LuxS inactivation reveal a metabolic rather than quorum-sensing role for LuxS in Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23.

Authors:  Charlotte M Wilson; Raphael B M Aggio; Paul W O'Toole; Silas Villas-Boas; Gerald W Tannock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Metal Sequestration and Antimicrobial Activity of Human Calprotectin Are pH-Dependent.

Authors:  Tomer Rosen; Elizabeth M Nolan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Transient MutS-Based Hypermutation System for Adaptive Evolution of Lactobacillus casei to Low pH.

Authors:  Tom J Overbeck; Dennis L Welker; Joanne E Hughes; James L Steele; Jeff R Broadbent
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Physiological and proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus casei in response to acid adaptation.

Authors:  Chongde Wu; Guiqiang He; Juan Zhang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 7.  Recent advances of pH homeostasis mechanisms in Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Zhenping Ma; Jinshan Gao; Jinhua Zhao; Liang Wei; Jun Liu; Ning Xu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Short- and long-term adaptation to ethanol stress and its cross-protective consequences in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Hermien van Bokhorst-van de Veen; Tjakko Abee; Marcel Tempelaars; Peter A Bron; Michiel Kleerebezem; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Ángel Alegría; Peter A Bron; Maria de Angelis; Marco Gobbetti; Michiel Kleerebezem; José A Lemos; Daniel M Linares; Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton; Francesca Turroni; Douwe van Sinderen; Pekka Varmanen; Marco Ventura; Manuel Zúñiga; Effie Tsakalidou; Jan Kok
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Comparative genomic and functional analysis of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains marketed as probiotics.

Authors:  François P Douillard; Angela Ribbera; Hanna M Järvinen; Ravi Kant; Taija E Pietilä; Cinzia Randazzo; Lars Paulin; Pia K Laine; Cinzia Caggia; Ingemar von Ossowski; Justus Reunanen; Reetta Satokari; Seppo Salminen; Airi Palva; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.