Literature DB >> 10532386

Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine.

A Lonvaud-Funel1.   

Abstract

The winemaking process includes two main steps: lactic acid bacteria are responsible for the malolactic fermentation which follows the alcoholic fermentation by yeasts. Both types of microorganisms are present on grapes and on cellar equipment. Yeasts are better adapted to growth in grape must than lactic acid bacteria, so the alcoholic fermentation starts quickly. In must, up to ten lactic acid bacteria species can be identified. They belong to the Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc and Oenococcus genera. Throughout alcoholic fermentation, a natural selection occurs and finally the dominant species is O. oeni, due to interactions between yeasts and bacteria and between bacteria themselves. After bacterial growth, when the population is over 10(6) CFU/ml, malolactic transformation is the obvious change in wine composition. However, many other substrates can be metabolized. Some like remaining sugars and citric acid are always assimilated by lactic acid bacteria, thus providing them with energy and carbon. Other substrates such as some amino acids may be used following pathways restricted to strains carrying the adequate enzymes. Some strains can also produce exopolysaccharides. All these transformations greatly influence the sensory and hygienic quality of wine. Malic acid transformation is encouraged because it induces deacidification. Diacetyl produced from citric acid is also helpful to some extent. Sensory analyses show that many other reactions change the aromas and make malolactic fermentation beneficial, but they are as yet unknown. On the contrary, an excess of acetic acid, the synthesis of glucane, biogenic amines and precursors of ethylcarbamate are undesirable. Fortunately, lactic acid bacteria normally multiply in dry wines; moreover some of these activities are not widespread. Moreover, the most striking trait of wine lactic acid bacteria is their capacity to adapt to a hostile environment. The mechanisms for this are not yet completely elucidated. Molecular biology has provided some explanations for the behaviour and the metabolism of bacteria in wine. New tools are now available to detect the presence of desirable and undesirable strains. Even if much remains unknown, winemakers and oenologists can nowadays better control the process. By acting upon the diverse microflora and grape musts, they are more able to produce healthy and pleasant wines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10532386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek        ISSN: 0003-6072            Impact factor:   2.271


  86 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of PCR primers for analysis of bacterial populations in wine by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Isabel Lopez; Fernanda Ruiz-Larrea; Luca Cocolin; Erica Orr; Trevor Phister; Megan Marshall; Jean VanderGheynst; David A Mills
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Growth and consumption of L-malic acid in wine-like medium by acclimated and non-acclimated cultures of Patagonian Oenococcus oeni strains.

Authors:  Bárbara Mercedes Bravo-Ferrada; Axel Hollmann; Natalia Brizuela; Danay Valdés La Hens; Elizabeth Tymczyszyn; Liliana Semorile
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Effect of simultaneous inoculation with yeast and bacteria on fermentation kinetics and key wine parameters of cool-climate chardonnay.

Authors:  Delphine Jussier; Amélie Dubé Morneau; Ramón Mira de Orduña
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Differential real-time PCR assay for enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in wine.

Authors:  Ezekiel T Neeley; Trevor G Phister; David A Mills
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Metschnikowia strains isolated from botrytized grapes antagonize fungal and bacterial growth by iron depletion.

Authors:  Matthias Sipiczki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Adaptation of the wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni to ethanol stress: role of the small heat shock protein Lo18 in membrane integrity.

Authors:  Magali Maitre; Stéphanie Weidmann; Florence Dubois-Brissonnet; Vanessa David; Jacques Covès; Jean Guzzo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Discrimination of wine lactic acid bacteria by Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Susan B Rodriguez; Mark A Thornton; Roy J Thornton
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Lysogeny in the Lactic Acid Bacterium Oenococcus oeni Is Responsible for Modified Colony Morphology on Red Grape Juice Agar.

Authors:  Amel Chaïb; Cécile Philippe; Féty Jaomanjaka; Olivier Claisse; Mickaël Jourdes; Patrick Lucas; Stéphanie Cluzet; Claire Le Marrec
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The ftsH gene of the wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni is involved in protection against environmental stress.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Bourdineaud; Benjamin Nehmé; Sonia Tesse; Aline Lonvaud-Funel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Distribution and functions of phosphotransferase system genes in the genome of the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni.

Authors:  Zohra Jamal; Cécile Miot-Sertier; François Thibau; Lucie Dutilh; Aline Lonvaud-Funel; Patricia Ballestra; Claire Le Marrec; Marguerite Dols-Lafargue
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.