| Literature DB >> 23834699 |
Santi M Mandal1, Shalley Sharma, Anil Kumar Pinnaka, Annu Kumari, Suresh Korpole.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing multidrug-resistance in bacteria resulted in a greater need to find alternative antimicrobial substances that can be used for clinical applications or preservation of food and dairy products. Research on antimicrobial peptides including lipopeptides exhibiting both narrow and broad spectrum inhibition activities is increasing in the recent past. Therefore, the present study was aimed at isolation and characterization of antimicrobial lipopeptide producing bacterial strains from fecal contaminated soil sample.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23834699 PMCID: PMC3716907 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1Screening of isolates for antimicrobial activity. (A) colonies showing zone of clearance (B) well diffusion assay of methanol extracts. Selected colonies were purified and preserved. Further, methanol extracts were prepared from 48 h cell free fermented broth of all selected isolates and tested against S. aureus (MTCC1430).
Figure 2Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences of all strains showing the relationship with members of the genera and . The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree.
Figure 3Determination of antibacterial property of lipopeptide fractions. The assay performed against Gram positive S. epidermidis(A) and Gram negative P. aeruginosa(B) bacteria. Data are the means calculated from three replicate experiments and vertical bars correspond to standard deviations. Asterisk represents significant differences between treatments and negative control (0) with p<0.005 using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. The results are presented as the mean of triplicates (n=3) ± SD.
List of masses observed in fractionated lipopeptides from different samples obtained in positive ion linear mode
| Sample S-3 | Fr-a | 985.13 | 0.0021 |
| Fr-b | 985.73 | 0.0037 | |
| Fr-c | 1495.11 | 0.0069 | |
| Fr-d | 1522.52 | 0.003 | |
| Fr-e | 1065.22 | 0.0034 | |
| Fr-f | 607.21 | 0.01 | |
| Sample S-4 | Fr-a | 679.57 | 0.0052 |
| Fr-b | 984.82 | 0.01 | |
| Sample S-5 | Fr-a | 679.69 | 0.0092 |
| Fr-b | 984.77 | 0.01 | |
| Fr-c | 637.06 | 0.05 | |
| Fr-d | 746.17 | 0.0042 | |
| Sample S-6 | Fr-a | 1043.66 | 0.01 |
| Fr-b | 984.96 | 0.0059 | |
| Fr-c | 637.01 | 0.0071 | |
| Sample S-7 | Fr-a | 1180.01 | 0.022 |
| Fr-b | 985.01 | 0.015 | |
| Fr-c | 721.25 | 0.0011 | |
| Sample S-9 | Fr-a | 1536.16 | 0.0092 |
| Fr-b | 984.57 | 0.01 | |
| Sample S-10 | Fr-a | 1535.21 | 0.0074 |
| Fr-b | 984.21 | 0.0098 | |
| Sample S-11 | Fr-a | 1153.65 | 0.0075 |
| Fr-b | 984.22 | 0.0012 | |
| Fr-c | 1495.43 | 0.0045 | |
| Fr-d | 637.23 | 0.025 | |
| Fr-e | 1065.21 | 0.01 | |
| Sample S-12 | Fr-a | 679.23 | 0.003 |
| Fr-b | 984.14 | 0.0091 |
The calculations of standard deviation (SD) were done using MS Excel Descriptive Statistics for each ion measurements (n=4), mi is the measured mass and following is the formula: .
Figure 4MALDI MS spectrum of Fr-c and Fr-e from strainS-3 (identical spectrum is observed with the Fr-c and Fr-e of the strain S-11).