OBJECTIVE: To compare three-dimensional tooth movements resulting from relatively higher and lower stresses in a split-mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight volunteers whose maxillary first premolars were removed for orthodontic treatment participated. Each subject's maxillary canines were retracted by randomly assigned constant stresses of 78 kPa and 4 kPa via segmental mechanics. Dental casts depicting 8-10 visits per subject over 84 days and a three-axis microscope were used to measure movements serially. Descriptive statistics and mixed linear modeling were applied for data analyses (α = .05). RESULTS: Teeth moved by 78 kPa had significantly faster (P = .0005) distal movement (0.066 ± 0.020 mm/day) compared to teeth moved by 4 kPa (0.031 ± 0.012 mm/day). Lateral movement and distopalatal rotation were also significantly faster (fourfold and 10-fold, respectively) with higher than with lower stress (P < .0001). Average extrusion-intrusion, crown torque, and tip were small (≤ |0.25| mm, |2.29|°, and |1.98|°, respectively), fluctuated, and not significantly different between high and low stresses. No lag phase of tooth movement was evident. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary canines were retracted faster by 78 kPa than by 4 kPa. Controlled translation was possible with 4 kPa, but 78 kPa outstripped appliance constraints, causing distopalatal rotation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare three-dimensional tooth movements resulting from relatively higher and lower stresses in a split-mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight volunteers whose maxillary first premolars were removed for orthodontic treatment participated. Each subject's maxillary canines were retracted by randomly assigned constant stresses of 78 kPa and 4 kPa via segmental mechanics. Dental casts depicting 8-10 visits per subject over 84 days and a three-axis microscope were used to measure movements serially. Descriptive statistics and mixed linear modeling were applied for data analyses (α = .05). RESULTS: Teeth moved by 78 kPa had significantly faster (P = .0005) distal movement (0.066 ± 0.020 mm/day) compared to teeth moved by 4 kPa (0.031 ± 0.012 mm/day). Lateral movement and distopalatal rotation were also significantly faster (fourfold and 10-fold, respectively) with higher than with lower stress (P < .0001). Average extrusion-intrusion, crown torque, and tip were small (≤ |0.25| mm, |2.29|°, and |1.98|°, respectively), fluctuated, and not significantly different between high and low stresses. No lag phase of tooth movement was evident. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary canines were retracted faster by 78 kPa than by 4 kPa. Controlled translation was possible with 4 kPa, but 78 kPa outstripped appliance constraints, causing distopalatal rotation.
Authors: Jason A Yee; Tamer Türk; Selma Elekdağ-Türk; Lam L Cheng; M Ali Darendeliler Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Yijin Ren; Jaap C Maltha; Martin A Van 't Hof; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.650