Literature DB >> 10672218

Human tooth movement in response to continuous stress of low magnitude.

L R Iwasaki1, J E Haack, J C Nickel, J Morton.   

Abstract

Conventional orthodontic therapy often uses force magnitudes in excess of 100 g to retract canine teeth. Typically, this results in a lag phase of approximately 21 days before tooth movement occurs. The current project was undertaken to demonstrate that by using lower force magnitudes, tooth translation can start without a lag phase and can occur at velocities that are clinically significant. Seven subjects participated in the 84-day study. A continuous retraction force averaging 18 g was applied to 1 of the maxillary canines, whereas a continuous retraction force averaging 60 g was applied to the other. The magnitude was adjusted for each canine to produce equivalent compressive stresses between subjects. Estimated average compressive stress on the distal aspect of the canine teeth was 4 kPa or 13 kPa. The moment-to-force ratios were between 9 and 13 mm. Tooth movement in 3 linear and 3 rotational dimensions was measured with a 3-axis measuring microscope and a series of dental casts made at 1- to 14-day intervals. The results showed a statistical difference in the velocity of distal movement of the canines produced by the 2 stresses (P =.02). The lag phase was eliminated and average velocities were 0.87 and 1.27 mm/month for 18 and 60 g of average retraction force. Interindividual velocities varied as much as 3 to 1 for equivalent stress conditions. It was concluded that effective tooth movement can be produced with lower forces and that because loading conditions were controlled, cell biology must account for the variability in tooth velocities measured in these subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10672218     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70229-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  Understanding the basis of space closure in Orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Gerson Luiz Ulema Ribeiro; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

2.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of BALP, CTX-I, and IL-4 levels around miniscrew implants during orthodontic tooth movement between two different amounts of force.

Authors:  Mine Gecgelen Cesur; V Ozgen Ozturk; Beral Afacan; F Burcu Sirin; Afra Alkan; Torun Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Low-Magnitude Forces for Bone Modeling and Remodeling in Dentofacial Orthopedics.

Authors:  Achint Utreja
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  A novel biomechanical model assessing continuous orthodontic archwire activation.

Authors:  Christopher Canales; Matthew Larson; Dan Grauer; Rose Sheats; Clarke Stevens; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Biomechanical characterization of the periodontal ligament: Orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Richard Uhlir; Virginia Mayo; Pei Hua Lin; Si Chen; Yan-Ting Lee; Garland Hershey; Feng-Chang Lin; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Alignment of impacted maxillary canines: critical analysis of eruption path and treatment time.

Authors:  Michael Schubert; Uwe Baumert
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mohamed Youssef; Sharif Ashkar; Eyad Hamade; Norbert Gutknecht; Friedrich Lampert; Maziar Mir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.

Authors:  S Jack Burrow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.