Literature DB >> 19651334

Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.

Jason A Yee1, Tamer Türk, Selma Elekdağ-Türk, Lam L Cheng, M Ali Darendeliler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to measure the rate and the amount of orthodontically induced tooth movement under heavy (300 g) and light (50 g) continuous forces with superelastic nickel-titanium closing coils over a defined time (12 weeks).
METHODS: Fourteen patients who required maxillary canine retraction into first premolar extraction sites as part of their orthodontic treatment completed this study. In a split-mouth design, precalibrated nickel-titanium closing coil springs delivering a force of 300 g or 50 g were used to distalize the canines after an alignment and stabilization period. Intraoral and maxillary cast measurements were made at the beginning of canine retraction (T0) and every 28 days for 84 days (T1, T2, T3) to assess total space closure, canine retraction rate, canine retraction and molar anchorage loss, and canine rotation.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that the amount of initial tooth movement (T0-T1) was not related to force magnitude; however, during the T1-T2 and T2-T3 periods, increased amounts and higher rates of tooth movement were found with heavy forces. These significantly increased the rate and the amount of canine retraction, but the adverse effects of loss of canine rotation control and anchorage were concomitantly increased. Light forces provided a greater percentage of canine retraction than heavy forces, with less strain on anchorage.
CONCLUSIONS: Initial tooth movement would benefit from light forces. Heavier forces tend to increase the rate and the amount of canine retraction but lose their advantage because of unwanted clinical side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651334     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Prophylaxis protocols and their impact on bracket friction force.

Authors:  Sérgio Elias Neves Cury; Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Sérgio Schneider; Arnaldo Pinzan; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Tissue response resulting from different force magnitudes combined with corticotomy in rats.

Authors:  Kriangkrai Kraiwattanapong; Bancha Samruajbenjakun
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.

Authors:  W Perrey; A Konermann; L Keilig; S Reimann; A Jäger; C Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 6.  Low-Magnitude Forces for Bone Modeling and Remodeling in Dentofacial Orthopedics.

Authors:  Achint Utreja
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Comparison of movement rate with different initial moment-to-force ratios.

Authors:  Shuning Li; Jie Chen; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Effects of different force magnitudes on corticotomy-assisted orthodontic tooth movement in rats.

Authors:  Kriangkrai Kraiwattanapong; Bancha Samruajbenjakun
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Human tooth movement by continuous high and low stresses.

Authors:  Whitney N Deforest; Jodi K Hentscher-Johnson; Ying Liu; Hongzeng Liu; Jeffrey C Nickel; Laura R Iwasaki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Micro-osteoperforation effectiveness on tooth movement rate and impact on oral health related quality of life.

Authors:  Liana Fattori; Michelle Sendyk; João Batista de Paiva; David Normando; José Rino Neto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.