Literature DB >> 22230898

The costs of changing an intended action: movement planning, but not execution, interferes with verbal working memory.

M A Spiegel1, D Koester, M Weigelt, T Schack.   

Abstract

How much cognitive effort does it take to change a movement plan? In previous studies, it has been shown that humans plan and represent actions in advance, but it remains unclear whether or not action planning and verbal working memory share cognitive resources. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we combined in two experiments a grasp-to-place task with a verbal working memory task. Participants planned a placing movement toward one of two target positions and subsequently encoded and maintained visually presented letters. Both experiments revealed that re-planning the intended action reduced letter recall performance; execution time, however, was not influenced by action modifications. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the action's interference with verbal working memory arose during the planning rather than the execution phase of the movement. Together, our results strongly suggest that movement planning and verbal working memory share common cognitive resources.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22230898     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  8 in total

1.  Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.

Authors:  M A Spiegel; D Koester; T Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-06

2.  Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations.

Authors:  Dirk Koester; Thomas Schack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Rumeysa Gunduz Can; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-29

4.  Event-related brain potentials for goal-related power grips.

Authors:  Jan Westerholz; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23

6.  Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-11

7.  Cognitive-motor interference while grasping, lifting and holding objects.

Authors:  Erwan Guillery; André Mouraux; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  No Interrelation of Motor Planning and Executive Functions across Young Ages.

Authors:  Kathrin Wunsch; Roland Pfister; Anne Henning; Gisa Aschersleben; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.