Literature DB >> 23832519

Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

Myriam Renaud1, Nicolas Reibel, Rasa Zarnegar, Adeline Germain, Didier Quilliot, Ahmet Ayav, Laurent Bresler, Laurent Brunaud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most commonly performed bariatric operation worldwide for the surgical management of obesity. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TR-RYGBP) has been considered to be a better approach by some groups especially early in a surgeon's experience. However, the learning curve associated with TR-RYGBP has been poorly evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of patients who underwent TR-RYGBP.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of 154 first consecutive patients undergoing TR-RYGBP to analyze the influence of surgeon experience, bedside first assistant, and patient factors on operative time and postoperative complications. To give a comprehensive view of success related to the learning process, a single hybrid variable was generated. Multivariate analysis predicted the risk factors for complications and operative time. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis estimated the learning curve.
RESULTS: The learning curve for TR-RYGBP was 84 cases. Case rank and first assistant level were independent predictors of total operative time. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity rate was 33.1 % and decreased over time. Surgeon experience (OR 2.6; CI 95 [1.290 to 5.479]; p = 0.0081) and first assistant level (OR 2.42; CI 95 [1.197 to 4.895]; p = 0.0139) remained independent predictors of composite event (operative time and complications).
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifed criteria that should be assessed in future studies about TR-RYGBP. Both surgeon experience and bedside first assistant level affected operative duration, but surgeon experience was the most significant factor in reducing complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23832519     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1020-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  35 in total

1.  Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.

Authors:  L Chang; R M Satava; C A Pellegrini; M N Sinanan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely.

Authors:  Gijs I T Iordens; René A Klaassen; Esther M M van Lieshout; Berry I Cleffken; Erwin van der Harst
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers.

Authors:  Ken Tieu; Nathan Allison; Brad Snyder; Todd Wilson; Michelle Toder; Erik Wilson
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?

Authors:  Chan W Park; Edward C F Lam; Teresa M Walsh; Maxine Karimoto; Adrienne T Ma; Matthew Koo; Chet Hammill; Kenric Murayama; Cedric S F Lorenzo; Racquel Bueno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Pascal Bucher; Monika E Hagen; Gilles Chassot; Pascale Koutny-Fong; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued in the U.S.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery.

Authors:  J Poloniecki; O Valencia; P Littlejohns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

8.  The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution's experience.

Authors:  Thierry Bege; Bernard Lelong; Benjamin Esterni; Olivier Turrini; Jerôme Guiramand; Daniel Francon; Djamel Mokart; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Marc Giovannini; Jean Robert Delpero
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Boris Zevin; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency.

Authors:  K Narazaki; D Oleynikov; N Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  13 in total

1.  The Results of 100 Robotic Versus 100 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedures: a Single High Volume Centre Experience.

Authors:  R M Smeenk; G van 't Hof; E Elsten; P G B M Feskens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a novel robotic surgery patient-side simulator: the Xperience™ Team Trainer.

Authors:  Song Xu; Manuela Perez; Cyril Perrenot; Nicolas Hubert; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic Roux en Y gastric bypass can be safe and cost-effective in a rural setting: clinical outcomes from a community hospital bariatric program.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Oviedo; Tapan Nayak; Zhuoxin Long; Mengying Yan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 4.  An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery.

Authors:  Luise I M Pernar; Faith C Robertson; Ali Tavakkoli; Eric G Sheu; David C Brooks; Douglas S Smink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli; Ray Price; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.

Authors:  F S Wehrtmann; J R de la Garza; K F Kowalewski; M W Schmidt; K Müller; C Tapking; P Probst; M K Diener; L Fischer; B P Müller-Stich; F Nickel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Robotic-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Learning Curve Assessment Using Cumulative Sum and Literature Review.

Authors:  Roberto Bustos; Alberto Mangano; Federico Gheza; Liaohai Chen; Gabriela Aguiluz-Cornejo; Antonio Gangemi; Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen; Chandra Hassan; Mario Masrur
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 0.607

9.  Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice.

Authors:  Jerome R Lyn-Sue; Josh S Winder; Shannon Kotch; Jacob Colello; Salvatore Docimo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-03-16

10.  Face and content validity of Xperience™ Team Trainer: bed-side assistant training simulator for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Sessa; Cyril Perrenot; Song Xu; Jacques Hubert; Laurent Bresler; Laurent Brunaud; Manuela Perez
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.