OBJECTIVES: To determine retrospectively the additional value of DWI-MRI toT2-MRI for predicting complete response (ypT0N0 = CR) after chemoradiation-therapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Seventy locally advanced rectal cancer patients underwent CRT followed by restaging MRI and resection. Two readers with different experience levels independently scored T2 images for CR and, in a second reading, combined T2 and DWI. A 5-point confidence-level score was used to generate ROC curves. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) and interobserver agreement were compared for both readings. Histology served as reference standard. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement increased after addition of DWI from 0.35 to 0.58 but the AUC improved only for the experienced reader (0.77 to 0.89, p = 0.005 vs. 0.74 to 0.70, p > 0.05). Sensitivity and NPV improved from 20-30 % to 40-70 %, respectively 88 % to 91-95 %. Specificity and PPV improved only for the experienced reader (87 to 93 % respectively 27 to 63 %). CONCLUSION: Adding DWI to T2-MRI improves consistency between readers and has potential to improve readers' accuracy dependent on his/her experience. DWI could be of additional value, particularly in ruling out CR (high NPV), but considering the sub-optimal PPV one should be cautious about relying solely on MRI for the clinical decision to offer a wait-and-see strategy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine retrospectively the additional value of DWI-MRI toT2-MRI for predicting complete response (ypT0N0 = CR) after chemoradiation-therapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Seventy locally advanced rectal cancerpatients underwent CRT followed by restaging MRI and resection. Two readers with different experience levels independently scored T2 images for CR and, in a second reading, combined T2 and DWI. A 5-point confidence-level score was used to generate ROC curves. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) and interobserver agreement were compared for both readings. Histology served as reference standard. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement increased after addition of DWI from 0.35 to 0.58 but the AUC improved only for the experienced reader (0.77 to 0.89, p = 0.005 vs. 0.74 to 0.70, p > 0.05). Sensitivity and NPV improved from 20-30 % to 40-70 %, respectively 88 % to 91-95 %. Specificity and PPV improved only for the experienced reader (87 to 93 % respectively 27 to 63 %). CONCLUSION: Adding DWI to T2-MRI improves consistency between readers and has potential to improve readers' accuracy dependent on his/her experience. DWI could be of additional value, particularly in ruling out CR (high NPV), but considering the sub-optimal PPV one should be cautious about relying solely on MRI for the clinical decision to offer a wait-and-see strategy.
Authors: R Hughes; R Glynne-Jones; J Grainger; P Richman; A Makris; M Harrison; R Ashford; R A Harrison; J I Livingstone; P J McDonald; J Meyrick Thomas; I C Mitchell; J M A Northover; R Phillips; M Wallace; A Windsor; J R Novell Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2005-04-30 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Leire Arbea; Juan A Díaz-González; Jose Carlos Subtil; Josu Sola; Jose Luis Hernandez-Lizoain; Rafael Martínez-Monge; Marta Moreno; Javier Aristu Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dow-Mu Koh; Ian Chau; Diana Tait; Andrew Wotherspoon; David Cunningham; Gina Brown Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Max J Lahaye; Geerard L Beets; Sanne M E Engelen; Alfons G H Kessels; Adriaan P de Bruïne; Herry W S Kwee; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: C Coco; A Manno; C Mattana; A Verbo; G Rizzo; V Valentini; M A Gambacorta; F M Vecchio; D D'Ugo Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Roy F A Vliegen; Geerard L Beets; Guido Lammering; Raphaëla C Dresen; Harm J Rutten; Alfons G Kessels; Toen-Khiam Oei; Adriaan P de Bruïne; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Doenja M J Lambregts; Miriam M van Heeswijk; Andrea Delli Pizzi; Saskia G C van Elderen; Luisa Andrade; Nicky H G M Peters; Peter A M Kint; Margreet Osinga-de Jong; Shandra Bipat; Rik Ooms; Max J Lahaye; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Frans C H Bakers; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marc J Gollub; Ivana Blazic; David D B Bates; Naomi Campbell; Andrea Knezevic; Mithat Gonen; Patricio Lynn; Martin R Weiser; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Andreas M Hötker; Andrea Cercek; Leonard Saltz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Baodong Liu; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Kiran K Busireddy; Ersan Altun; Janaka Kalubowila; Richard C Semelka Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2014-08-28
Authors: Seth I Felder; Sebastian Feuerlein; Arthur Parsee; Iman Imanirad; Julian Sanchez; Sophie Dessureault; Richard Kim; Sarah Hoffe; Jessica Frakes; James Costello Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-10-28