Marc J Gollub1, Ivana Blazic2, David D B Bates3, Naomi Campbell4, Andrea Knezevic5, Mithat Gonen5, Patricio Lynn6, Martin R Weiser7, Julio Garcia-Aguilar7, Andreas M Hötker8, Andrea Cercek9, Leonard Saltz9. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. gollubm@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Clinical Hospital Center Zemun, Vukova 9, Belgrade, 11080, Serbia. 3. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 4. IMED Radiology Network, Level 3, 104 Breakfast Creek Road, Newstead, QLD, 4006, Australia. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the appearance of rectal cancer on MRI after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (ICT) and make a preliminary assessment of MRI's value in predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study between 1 January 2010-20 October 2014, pre- and post-ICT tumour T2 volume, relative T2 signal intensity (rT2SI), node size, signal intensity and border characteristics were assessed in 63 patients (65 tumours) by three readers. The strength of association between the reference standard of histopathological percent tumour response and tumour volume change, rT2SI and lymph node characteristics was assessed with Spearman's correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Cox regression was used to assess association between DFS and radiological measures. RESULTS: Change in T2 volume was not associated with TNT response. Change in rT2SI showed correlation with TNT response for one reader only using selective regions of interest (ROIs) and borderline correlation with response using total volume ROI. There was a significant negative correlation between baseline and post-ICT node size and TNT response (r = -0.25, p = 0.05; r = -0.35, p = 0.005, readers 1 and 2, respectively). Both baseline and post-induction median node sizes were significantly smaller in complete responders (p = 0.03, 0.001; readers 1 and 2, respectively). Change in largest baseline node size and decrease in post-ICT node signal heterogeneity were associated with 100% tumour response (p = 0.04). Nodal sizes at baseline and post-ICT MRI correlated with DFS. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing post-ICT MRI, tumour volume did not correlate with TNT response, but decreased lymph node sizes were significantly associated with complete response to TNT as well as DFS. Relative T2SI showed borderline correlation with TNT response. KEY POINTS: • MRI-based tumour volume after induction chemotherapy and before chemoradiotherapy did not correlate with overall tumour response at the end of all treatment. • Lymph node size after induction chemotherapy and before chemoradiotherapy was strongly associated with complete pathological response after all treatment. • Lymph node sizes at baseline and post-induction chemotherapy MRI correlated with disease-free survival.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the appearance of rectal cancer on MRI after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (ICT) and make a preliminary assessment of MRI's value in predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study between 1 January 2010-20 October 2014, pre- and post-ICT tumourT2 volume, relative T2 signal intensity (rT2SI), node size, signal intensity and border characteristics were assessed in 63 patients (65 tumours) by three readers. The strength of association between the reference standard of histopathological percent tumour response and tumour volume change, rT2SI and lymph node characteristics was assessed with Spearman's correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Cox regression was used to assess association between DFS and radiological measures. RESULTS: Change in T2 volume was not associated with TNT response. Change in rT2SI showed correlation with TNT response for one reader only using selective regions of interest (ROIs) and borderline correlation with response using total volume ROI. There was a significant negative correlation between baseline and post-ICT node size and TNT response (r = -0.25, p = 0.05; r = -0.35, p = 0.005, readers 1 and 2, respectively). Both baseline and post-induction median node sizes were significantly smaller in complete responders (p = 0.03, 0.001; readers 1 and 2, respectively). Change in largest baseline node size and decrease in post-ICT node signal heterogeneity were associated with 100% tumour response (p = 0.04). Nodal sizes at baseline and post-ICT MRI correlated with DFS. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing post-ICT MRI, tumour volume did not correlate with TNT response, but decreased lymph node sizes were significantly associated with complete response to TNT as well as DFS. Relative T2SI showed borderline correlation with TNT response. KEY POINTS: • MRI-based tumour volume after induction chemotherapy and before chemoradiotherapy did not correlate with overall tumour response at the end of all treatment. • Lymph node size after induction chemotherapy and before chemoradiotherapy was strongly associated with complete pathological response after all treatment. • Lymph node sizes at baseline and post-induction chemotherapy MRI correlated with disease-free survival.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemotherapy; MRI; Rectal cancer; Total neoadjuvant treatment
Authors: U B Patel; G Brown; I Machado; J Santos-Cores; C Pericay; E Ballesteros; A Salud; M Isabel-Gil; C Montagut; J Maurel; J Ramón-Ayuso; N Martin; R Estevan; C Fernandez-Martos Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Gina Brown; Catherine J Richards; Michael W Bourne; Robert G Newcombe; Andrew G Radcliffe; Nicholas S Dallimore; Geraint T Williams Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Joo Hee Kim; Geerard L Beets; Myeong-Jin Kim; Alfons G H Kessels; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Doenja M J Lambregts; Sheng-Xiang Rao; Sander Sassen; Milou H Martens; Luc A Heijnen; Jeroen Buijsen; Meindert Sosef; Geerard L Beets; Roy A Vliegen; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andreas M Hötker; Lisa Tarlinton; Yousef Mazaheri; Kaitlin M Woo; Mithat Gönen; Leonard B Saltz; Karyn A Goodman; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Marc J Gollub Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: F Sclafani; G Brown; D Cunningham; A Wotherspoon; D Tait; C Peckitt; J Evans; S Yu; L Sena Teixeira Mendes; J Tabernero; B Glimelius; A Cervantes; J Thomas; R Begum; J Oates; I Chau Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Seth I Felder; Sebastian Feuerlein; Arthur Parsee; Iman Imanirad; Julian Sanchez; Sophie Dessureault; Richard Kim; Sarah Hoffe; Jessica Frakes; James Costello Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-10-28