Literature DB >> 23829183

States Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (SMART) Collaborative: data collection, linkage, dissemination, and use.

Allison S Mneimneh1, Sheree L Boulet, Saswati Sunderam, Yujia Zhang, Denise J Jamieson, Sara Crawford, Patricia McKane, Glenn Copeland, Michael Mersol-Barg, Violanda Grigorescu, Bruce Cohen, JoAnn Steele, William Sappenfield, Hafsatou Diop, Russell S Kirby, Dmitry M Kissin.   

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) refers to fertility treatments in which both eggs and sperm are handled outside the body. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) oversees the National ART Surveillance System (NASS), which collects data on all ART procedures performed in the United States. The NASS, while a comprehensive source of data on ART patient demographics and clinical procedures, includes limited information on outcomes related to women's and children's health. To examine ART-related health outcomes, CDC and three states (Massachusetts, Florida, and Michigan) established the States Monitoring ART (SMART) Collaborative to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes of ART and improve state-based ART surveillance. To date, NASS data have been linked with states' vital records, disease registries, and hospital discharge data with a linkage rate of 90.2%. The probabilistic linkage methodology used in the SMART Collaborative has been validated and found to be both accurate and efficient. A wide breadth of applied research within the Collaborative is planned or ongoing, including examinations of the impact of insurance mandates on ART use as well as the relationships between ART and birth defects and cancer, among others. The SMART Collaborative is working to improve state-based ART surveillance by developing state surveillance plans, establishing partnerships, and conducting data analyses. The SMART Collaborative has been instrumental in creating linked datasets and strengthening epidemiologic and research capacity for improving maternal and infant health programs and evaluating the public health impact of ART.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23829183     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  31 in total

1.  Using multiple imputation to address the inconsistent distribution of a controlling variable when modeling an infrequent outcome.

Authors:  Yujia Zhang; Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Michael Monsour; Bruce Cohen; Patricia McKane; Karen Freeman
Journal:  J Mod Appl Stat Methods       Date:  2017

2.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Estimates of lifetime infertility from three states: the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Chris Fussman; Marie Bailey; Dana Bernson; Denise J Jamieson; Melissa Murray-Jordan; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Measuring infertility: searching for consensus.

Authors:  Marie Thoma
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kissin; Denise J Jamieson; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Maternal Smoking Among Women With and Without Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Van T Tong; Dmitry M Kissin; Dana Bernson; Glenn Copeland; Sheree L Boulet; Yujia Zhang; Denise J Jamieson; Lucinda J England
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Assisted reproduction and risk of preterm birth in singletons by infertility diagnoses and treatment modalities: a population-based study.

Authors:  Galit Levi Dunietz; Claudia Holzman; Yujia Zhang; Chenxi Li; David Todem; Sheree L Boulet; Patricia McKane; Dmitry M Kissin; Glenn Copeland; Dana Bernson; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Jeani Chang; Sheree Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry Kissin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Identifying women with indicators of subfertility in a statewide population database: operationalizing the missing link in assisted reproductive technology research.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Impact of ART on pregnancies in California: an analysis of maternity outcomes and insights into the added burden of neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  T A Merritt; M Goldstein; R Philips; R Peverini; J Iwakoshi; A Rodriguez; B Oshiro
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.