| Literature DB >> 23826264 |
Smiths Lueong1, Smiths Leong, Gustave Simo, Mamadou Camara, Vincent Jamonneau, Jacques Kabore, Hamidou Ilboudo, Bruno Bucheton, Jörg D Hoheisel, Christine Clayton.
Abstract
Simple, reliable tools for diagnosis of human African Trypanosomiases could ease field surveillance and enhance patient care. In particular, current methods to distinguish patients with (stage II) and without (stage I) brain involvement require samples of cerebrospinal fluid. We describe here an exploratory study to find out whether miRNAs from peripheral blood leukocytes might be useful in diagnosis of human trypanosomiasis, or for determining the stage of the disease. Using microarrays, we measured miRNAs in samples from Trypanosoma brucei gambiense-infected patients (9 stage I, 10 stage II), 8 seronegative parasite-negative controls and 12 seropositive, but parasite-negative subjects. 8 miRNAs (out of 1205 tested) showed significantly lower expression in patients than in seronegative, parasite-negative controls, and 1 showed increased expression. There were no clear differences in miRNAs between patients in different disease stages. The miRNA profiles could not distinguish seropositive, but parasitologically negative samples from controls and results within this group did not correlate with those from the trypanolysis test. Some of the regulated miRNAs, or their predicted mRNA targets, were previously reported changed during other infectious diseases or cancer. We conclude that the changes in miRNA profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes in human African trypanosomiasis are related to immune activation or inflammation, are probably disease-non-specific, and cannot be used to determine the disease stage. The approach has little promise for diagnostics but might yield information about disease pathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23826264 PMCID: PMC3695006 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sample classification based on multiple diagnostic tests.
| Patient | CATT | Mn-BC | Cell | Stage | PCR | Trypano-lysis | Status | miRNA pattern |
| Bo.470/6 | + | >100 | 0 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.471/6 | + | >50 | 0 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.472/6 | + | + | 0 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.475/6 | + | 10 | 5 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.480/6 | + | >100 | 5 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.481/6 | + | 6 | 1 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.484/6 | + | >100 | 1 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.487/6 | + | + | 2 | I | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.502/6 | +/− | 1 | I | + | + | HAT | A | |
| Bo 482/6 | + | >50 | 32 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.473/6 | + | 6 | 6 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.474/6 | + | 10 | 212 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.476/6 | +/− | >50 | 541 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.477/6 | + | >20 | 15 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.478/6 | + | >10 | 228 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.479/6 | + | 2 | 13 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.≈/6 | + | >100 | 80 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.485/6 | + | >50 | 6 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.486/6 | + | + | 6 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.488/6 | + | >100 | 51 | II | + | + | HAT | A |
| Bo.492/6 | + | − | − | + | Seropo/AT | A | ||
| Bo.494/6 | + | − | − | − | Seropo/AT | A | ||
| Bo489/6 | + | − | − | + | Seropo | A | ||
| Bo500/6 | +/− | − | − | + | Seropo | B | ||
| Bo.490/6 | + | − | − | + | Seropo | A | ||
| Bo.498/6 | + | − | − | + | Seropo | B | ||
| Bo.527/6 | + | − | − | + | Seropo | B | ||
| Bo.491/6 | + | − | − | − | Seropo | A | ||
| Bo.493/6 | + | − | − | − | Seropo | B | ||
| Bo.499/6 | + | − | − | − | Seropo | A | ||
| Bo.520/6 | + | − | − | − | Seropo | B | ||
| Bo495/6 | + | − | − | − | Seropo | B | ||
| Bo.537/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.538/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.509/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.511/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.514/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.518/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.521/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B | ||
| Bo.529/6 | − | − | − | − | Control | B |
The patient codes are shown on the left. Mn-BC: Buffy coat mini concentration column, number of parasites; “+” means present but not counted; Cell: white cell count in CSF for staging; PCR: presence of parasite DNA; Trypanolysis: positive result from the trypanolysis test; Status: Ser+ − positive by CATT; AT: previously treated patient. miR expression pattern: A = more similar to infected, B = more similar to control.
miRNAs with altered abundance in sleeping sickness.
| miRNA ID | Log2FC stage I | p-value stage I | Log2FC stage II | p-value stage II | Log2FC all | p-value all |
| miR-199a-3p | −6.9 | 2 E-4 | −6.9 | 1E-5 | −6. 8 | 2E-6 |
| miR-27b | −6.8 | 2E-4 | −6.7 | 6E-5 | −6.6 | 2E-6 |
| miR-126* | −6.7 | 3E-4 | −6.4 | 2E-4 | −6.4 | 2E-6 |
| miR-98 | −5.9 | 3E-3 | −6.3 | 6E-4 | −6.1 | 2E-4 |
| miR-409-3p | −5.5 | 7E-3 | −5.1 | 0.01 | −5.2 | 1E-3 |
| miR-4291 | −5.3 | 7E-3 | −6.1 | 6E-4 | −5.6 | 2E-4 |
| miR-146b-5p | −4.5 | 0.03 | −4.3 | 0.02 | n/a | n/a |
| miR-454 | −4.1 | 0.04 | −4.1 | 0.04 | −4.1 | 0.02 |
| miR-193b | 4.4 | 0.04 | 4.1 | 0.05 | 4.2 | 0.02 |
| miR-195 | −5.1 | 0.01 | −4.5 | 0.01 | ||
| miR-144* | −4.7 | 0.01 | −4.3 | 0.01 | ||
| miR-22* | −5.1 | 3E-3 | n/a | n/a | ||
| miR-374c | −4.6 | 0.02 | n/a | n/a | ||
| miR-338-5p | 4.7 | 0.01 | n/a | n/a |
All miRNAs that showed some alteration in at least one stage of sleeping sickness are shown. Log2 FC is Log2 of the arithmetic mean fold change in patients relative to the average value for controls. The p-values are also shown. Student’s t-tests were used to compare paired and multiple groups, with a Benjamini-Hochberg correction for false discovery. A threshold of 0.05 was set for significance. Although some miRNAs were significantly altered in only one stage, further analysis of these showed no significant difference between stage I and stage II.
Figure 1miRNAs with altered abundance in sleeping sickness.
Data for the miRNAs from Table 1 are illustrated, showing the Log2 fold changes for individual patients. The color code for the spots is at top right.
Figure 2Cluster dendrogram for all samples.
The samples were classified according to miRNA expression patterns, using the miRNAs in Table 1, and a dendrogram was made to show the relationships. The color codes are shown on the Figure.