Literature DB >> 17929302

Differences between the data from free flow and intubated flow in women with urinary incontinence. What do they mean?

Françoise Valentini1, Brigitte Marti, Gilberte Robain, Pierre Nelson.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the effects of a urethral catheter on the urodynamic data extracted from uroflow in women, and to interpret the differences from free uroflow using the VBN mathematical micturition model.
METHODS: Urodynamic data of 217 consecutive (June 2002 to December 2004) women with urinary incontinence and without neurological disease or more than grade 2 prolapse were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were to perform one free flow (FF) and one intubated flow (IF) (voided volumes of at least 100 ml and continuous flow curves). Voiding parameters: volumes, maximum flow rate, detrusor pressure and flow time, were analyzed as some characteristic ratios. The VBN model was used to make simulations of various pathophysiological hypotheses.
RESULTS: Significant increased residual volume and flow time, decreased maximum flow rate were observed during IF. Twenty five patients had a residual volume only during IF; in that group, both decrease of Q(max) and increase of flow time were significant. Simulations showed that the geometrical effect of the catheter was not the only cause and allowed to propose the occurrence of a compression-like effect of the urethra and of a fading of the detrusor excitation after Q(max) to explain the results.
CONCLUSION: Significant differences were found between the data from a FF and an IF in women with urinary incontinence. These findings bring to the fore the impact of the transurethral catheter and underline the necessity to obtain at least one FF and one IF during a urodynamic session. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17929302     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  6 in total

1.  Decreased maximum flow rate during intubated flow is not only due to urethral catheter in situ.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini; Gilberte Robain; Dorothée S Hennebelle; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Female voiding dysfunction: prevalence and common associations.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Functional effect of transient transurethral catheterization on micturition in women: comment.

Authors:  Françoise A Valentini; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The effect of a 6 Fr catheter in women: Are they obstructive?

Authors:  Patrick Richard; Nydia Icaza Ordonez; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Detrusor after-contraction: a new insight.

Authors:  Francoise A Valentini; Brigitte G Marti; Gilberte Robain; Pierre P Nelson
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Impact of urethral catheterization on uroflow during pressure-flow study.

Authors:  Bi Song Zhu; Hui Chuan Jiang; Yuan Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 1.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.