Literature DB >> 23825867

THE EFFECTS OF REDUCED CIGARETTE SMOKING ON DISCOUNTING FUTURE REWARDS: AN INITIAL EVALUATION.

Richard Yi1, Matthew W Johnson, Louis A Giordano, Reid D Landes, Gary J Badger, Warren K Bickel.   

Abstract

To determine whether reduction of smoking via contingency management in dependent smokers would decrease the discounting of delayed reinforcers compared with smokers who did not reduce their smoking, moderate to heavy cigarette smokers were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: a contingency management condition and a control condition. In three phases (baseline discounting determination for hypothetical money and cigarettes, implementation of a contingency management or control condition, and postintervention discounting determination), the procedure to reinforce reduction in cigarette smoking produced CO decreases in all subjects exposed to that procedure. Discounting decreased significantly for both cigarettes and money among the group for whom smoking reductions were reinforced, whereas the control group showed no significant change for either commodity. Reductions in smoking can lead to reductions in discounting, and increased discounting in current smokers may be a reversible effect of nicotine dependence.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 23825867      PMCID: PMC3697871          DOI: 10.1007/bf03395609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rec        ISSN: 0033-2933


  26 in total

1.  A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar.

Authors:  J M Roll; S T Higgins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls.

Authors:  N M Petry
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Andrea M Begotka; Bethany R Raiff; Lana L Kastern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Mild opioid deprivation increases the degree that opioid-dependent outpatients discount delayed heroin and money.

Authors:  Louis A Giordano; Warren K Bickel; George Loewenstein; Eric A Jacobs; Lisa Marsch; Gary J Badger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision-making: delay, uncertainty and effort discounting.

Authors:  Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards.

Authors:  Carla H Lagorio; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Moderate drug use and delay discounting: a comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel; Forest Baker
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards.

Authors:  G J Madden; N M Petry; G J Badger; W K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Impulsivity and history of drug dependence.

Authors:  T J Allen; F G Moeller; H M Rhoades; D R Cherek
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  41 in total

1.  A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention.

Authors:  Peter T Radu; Richard Yi; Warren K Bickel; James J Gross; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models?

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Derek D Reed
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2009

3.  Predictors of delay discounting among smokers: education level and a Utility Measure of Cigarette Reinforcement Efficacy are better predictors than demographics, smoking characteristics, executive functioning, impulsivity, or time perception.

Authors:  A George Wilson; Christopher T Franck; E Terry Mueller; Reid D Landes; Benjamin P Kowal; Richard Yi; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  A comparison of delay discounting in adolescents and adults in treatment for cannabis use disorders.

Authors:  Dustin C Lee; Catherine Stanger; Alan J Budney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Cocaine dependent individuals discount future rewards more than future losses for both cocaine and monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Natalie R Bruner; Patrick S Johnson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  The Influence of Harm Avoidance and Impulsivity on Delay Discounting Rates.

Authors:  Lindy K Howe; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2019-08-30

Review 7.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

8.  Exploring Relationships Among Experience of Regret, Delay Discounting, and Worries About Future Effects of Smoking Among Current Smokers.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; James F Thrasher; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.164

9.  Delay discounting in adults receiving treatment for marijuana dependence.

Authors:  Erica N Peters; Nancy M Petry; Donna M Lapaglia; Brady Reynolds; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  Quantifying reinforcement value and demand for psychoactive substances in humans.

Authors:  Adrienne J Heinz; Todd C Lilje; Jon D Kassel; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.