Literature DB >> 25260200

Cocaine dependent individuals discount future rewards more than future losses for both cocaine and monetary outcomes.

Matthew W Johnson1, Natalie R Bruner2, Patrick S Johnson2.   

Abstract

Cocaine dependence and other forms of drug dependence are associated with steeper devaluation of future outcomes (delay discounting). Although studies in this domain have typically assessed choices between monetary gains (e.g., receive less money now versus receive more money after a delay), delay discounting is also applicable to decisions involving losses (e.g., small loss now versus larger delayed loss), with gains typically discounted more than losses (the "sign effect"). It is also known that drugs are discounted more than equivalently valued money. In the context of drug dependence, however, relatively little is known about the discounting of delayed monetary and drug losses and the presence of the sign effect. In this within-subject, laboratory study, delay discounting for gains and losses was assessed for cocaine and money outcomes in cocaine-dependent individuals (n=89). Both cocaine and monetary gains were discounted at significantly greater rates than cocaine and monetary losses, respectively (i.e., the sign effect). Cocaine gains were discounted significantly more than monetary gains, but cocaine and monetary losses were discounted similarly. Results suggest that cocaine is discounted by cocaine-dependent individuals in a systematic manner similar to other rewards. Because the sign effect was shown for both cocaine and money, delayed aversive outcomes may generally have greater impact than delayed rewards in shaping present behavior in this population.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral economics; Cocaine; Delay discounting; Drug dependence; Losses; Sign effect

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25260200      PMCID: PMC4438558          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  37 in total

1.  Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls.

Authors:  N M Petry
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Andrea M Begotka; Bethany R Raiff; Lana L Kastern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Concave utility, transaction costs, and risk in measuring discounting of delayed rewards.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Mariana Santiesteban
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls.

Authors:  Yannis Paloyelis; Philip Asherson; Mitul A Mehta; Stephen V Faraone; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Delay discounting in currently using and currently abstinent cocaine-dependent outpatients and non-drug-using matched controls.

Authors:  Sarah H Heil; Matthew W Johnson; Stephen T Higgins; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Moderate drug use and delay discounting: a comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel; Forest Baker
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  Neal S Hinvest; Ian M Anderson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Delay discounting in current and former marijuana-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel; Forest Baker; Brent A Moore; Gary J Badger; Alan J Budney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Temporal discounting in heroin-dependent patients: no sign effect, weaker magnitude effect, and the relationship with inhibitory control.

Authors:  Jiuqing Cheng; Yanhong Lu; Xiaodong Han; Claudia González-Vallejo; Nan Sui
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cocaine administration dose-dependently increases sexual desire and decreases condom use likelihood: The role of delay and probability discounting in connecting cocaine with HIV.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Evan S Herrmann; Mary M Sweeney; Robert S LeComte; Patrick S Johnson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Sex differences in animal models of decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Barry Setlow
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Cocaine-dependent adults and recreational cocaine users are more likely than controls to choose immediate unsafe sex over delayed safer sex.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Matthew W Johnson; Daisy G Y Thompson-Lake; Michael J Wesley; Terry Lohrenz; P Read Montague; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?

Authors:  Ariana Vanderveldt; Luís Oliveira; Leonard Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  Delay and probability discounting in cocaine use disorder: Comprehensive examination of money, cocaine, and health outcomes using gains and losses at multiple magnitudes.

Authors:  David J Cox; Sean B Dolan; Patrick Johnson; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Ethanol pre-exposure does not increase delay discounting in P rats, but does impair the ability to dynamically adapt behavioral allocation to changing reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  Steven Wesley Beckwith; Cristine Lynn Czachowski
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 7.  The impact of drugs of abuse on executive function: characterizing long-term changes in neural correlates following chronic drug exposure and withdrawal in rats.

Authors:  Adam T Brockett; Heather J Pribut; Daniela Vázquez; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Comparing Discounting of Potentially Real Rewards and Losses by Means of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Mathieu Pinger; Janine Thome; Patrick Halli; Wolfgang H Sommer; Georgia Koppe; Peter Kirsch
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28

9.  Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan J Becker; Jeremy M Haynes; Ann Galizio; Charles C J Frye; Haylee Downey; Jonathan E Friedel; D M Perez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.215

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.