OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that cognitive activity across the life span is related to late-life cognitive decline not linked to common neuropathologic disorders. METHODS: On enrollment, older participants in a longitudinal clinical-pathologic cohort study rated late-life (i.e., current) and early-life participation in cognitively stimulating activities. After a mean of 5.8 years of annual cognitive function testing, 294 individuals had died and undergone neuropathologic examination. Chronic gross infarcts, chronic microscopic infarcts, and neocortical Lewy bodies were identified, and measures of β-amyloid burden and tau-positive tangle density in multiple brain regions were derived. RESULTS: In a mixed-effects model adjusted for age at death, sex, education, gross and microscopic infarction, neocortical Lewy bodies, amyloid burden, and tangle density, more frequent late-life cognitive activity (estimate = 0.028, standard error [SE] = 0.008, p < 0.001) and early-life cognitive activity (estimate = 0.034, SE = 0.013, p = 0.008) were each associated with slower cognitive decline. The 2 measures together accounted for 14% of the residual variability in cognitive decline not related to neuropathologic burden. The early-life-activity association was attributable to cognitive activity in childhood (estimate = 0.027, SE = 0.012, p = 0.026) and middle age (estimate = 0.029, SE = 0.013, p = 0.025) but not young adulthood (estimate = -0.020, SE = 0.014, p = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: More frequent cognitive activity across the life span has an association with slower late-life cognitive decline that is independent of common neuropathologic conditions, consistent with the cognitive reserve hypothesis.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that cognitive activity across the life span is related to late-life cognitive decline not linked to common neuropathologic disorders. METHODS: On enrollment, older participants in a longitudinal clinical-pathologic cohort study rated late-life (i.e., current) and early-life participation in cognitively stimulating activities. After a mean of 5.8 years of annual cognitive function testing, 294 individuals had died and undergone neuropathologic examination. Chronic gross infarcts, chronic microscopic infarcts, and neocortical Lewy bodies were identified, and measures of β-amyloid burden and tau-positive tangle density in multiple brain regions were derived. RESULTS: In a mixed-effects model adjusted for age at death, sex, education, gross and microscopic infarction, neocortical Lewy bodies, amyloid burden, and tangle density, more frequent late-life cognitive activity (estimate = 0.028, standard error [SE] = 0.008, p < 0.001) and early-life cognitive activity (estimate = 0.034, SE = 0.013, p = 0.008) were each associated with slower cognitive decline. The 2 measures together accounted for 14% of the residual variability in cognitive decline not related to neuropathologic burden. The early-life-activity association was attributable to cognitive activity in childhood (estimate = 0.027, SE = 0.012, p = 0.026) and middle age (estimate = 0.029, SE = 0.013, p = 0.025) but not young adulthood (estimate = -0.020, SE = 0.014, p = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: More frequent cognitive activity across the life span has an association with slower late-life cognitive decline that is independent of common neuropathologic conditions, consistent with the cognitive reserve hypothesis.
Authors: Veronica Kwok; Zhendong Niu; Paul Kay; Ke Zhou; Lei Mo; Zhen Jin; Kwok-Fai So; Li Hai Tan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael Crowe; Ross Andel; Nancy L Pedersen; Boo Johansson; Margaret Gatz Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Anna C van Loenhoud; Alle Meije Wink; Colin Groot; Sander C J Verfaillie; Jos Twisk; Frederik Barkhof; Bart van Berckel; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier; Rik Ossenkoppele Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Richard J Caselli; Amylou C Dueck; Dona E C Locke; Leslie C Baxter; Bryan K Woodruff; Yonas E Geda Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Christopher M Gidicsin; Jacqueline E Maye; Joseph J Locascio; Lesley C Pepin; Marlie Philiossaint; J Alex Becker; Alayna P Younger; Maria Dekhtyar; Aaron P Schultz; Rebecca E Amariglio; Gad A Marshall; Dorene M Rentz; Trey Hedden; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jingyun Yang; Lei Yu; Christopher Gaiteri; Gyan P Srivastava; Lori B Chibnik; Sue E Leurgans; Julie A Schneider; Alexander Meissner; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 5.085
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle; Jingyun Yang; Bryan D James; David A Bennett Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Annie Robitaille; Ardo van den Hout; Robson J M Machado; David A Bennett; Iva Čukić; Ian J Deary; Scott M Hofer; Emiel O Hoogendijk; Martijn Huisman; Boo Johansson; Andriy V Koval; Maaike van der Noordt; Andrea M Piccinin; Judith J M Rijnhart; Archana Singh-Manoux; Johan Skoog; Ingmar Skoog; John Starr; Lisa Vermunt; Sean Clouston; Graciela Muniz Terrera Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.566