OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that late-life participation in mentally stimulating activities affects subsequent cognitive health. METHODS: Analyses are based on 1,076 older persons without dementia at study onset participating in a longitudinal cohort study. They completed annual clinical evaluations for a mean of 4.9 years. Each evaluation included administration of a self-report scale about participation in mentally stimulating activities and a battery of cognitive performance tests. Previously established measures of cognitively stimulating activity and cognitive function were derived. We assessed the temporal sequence of activity changes in relation to functional changes in a series of cross-lagged panel models adjusted for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: During the observation period, cognitive activity participation (estimate of mean annual change = -0.066, SE = 0.005, p < 0.001) and cognitive functioning (estimate = -0.077, SE = 0.005, p < 0.001) declined at rates that were moderately correlated (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). The level of cognitive activity in a given year predicted the level of global cognitive function in the following year, but the level of global cognition did not predict the subsequent level of cognitive activity participation. Cognitive activity showed the same pattern of unidirectional associations with measures of episodic and semantic memory, but its associations with working memory were bidirectional. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that more frequent mental stimulation in old age leads to better cognitive functioning.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that late-life participation in mentally stimulating activities affects subsequent cognitive health. METHODS: Analyses are based on 1,076 older persons without dementia at study onset participating in a longitudinal cohort study. They completed annual clinical evaluations for a mean of 4.9 years. Each evaluation included administration of a self-report scale about participation in mentally stimulating activities and a battery of cognitive performance tests. Previously established measures of cognitively stimulating activity and cognitive function were derived. We assessed the temporal sequence of activity changes in relation to functional changes in a series of cross-lagged panel models adjusted for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: During the observation period, cognitive activity participation (estimate of mean annual change = -0.066, SE = 0.005, p < 0.001) and cognitive functioning (estimate = -0.077, SE = 0.005, p < 0.001) declined at rates that were moderately correlated (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). The level of cognitive activity in a given year predicted the level of global cognitive function in the following year, but the level of global cognition did not predict the subsequent level of cognitive activity participation. Cognitive activity showed the same pattern of unidirectional associations with measures of episodic and semantic memory, but its associations with working memory were bidirectional. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that more frequent mental stimulation in old age leads to better cognitive functioning.
Authors: R S Wilson; D A Bennett; J L Bienias; N T Aggarwal; C F Mendes De Leon; M C Morris; J A Schneider; D A Evans Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-12-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michelle C Carlson; Michael J Helms; David C Steffens; James R Burke; Guy G Potter; Brenda L Plassman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: R S Wilson; L L Barnes; N T Aggarwal; P A Boyle; L E Hebert; C F Mendes de Leon; D A Evans Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael Crowe; Ross Andel; Nancy L Pedersen; Boo Johansson; Margaret Gatz Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Andreea M Rawlings; A Richey Sharrett; Andrea L C Schneider; Josef Coresh; Marilyn Albert; David Couper; Michael Griswold; Rebecca F Gottesman; Lynne E Wagenknecht; B Gwen Windham; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Aron S Buchman; Lisa L Barnes; Patricia A Boyle; Robert S Wilson Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: David A Bennett; Steven E Arnold; Michael J Valenzuela; Carol Brayne; Julie A Schneider Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; Ruth H Cha; Michelle M Mielke; Yonas E Geda; Bradley F Boeve; Mary M Machulda; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sophie Laforest; Agathe Lorthios-Guilledroit; Kareen Nour; Manon Parisien; Michel Fournier; Dave Ellemberg; Danielle Guay; Charles-Émile Desgagnés-Cyr; Nathalie Bier Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2017-04-01
Authors: Lei Yu; Patricia A Boyle; Eisuke Segawa; Sue Leurgans; Julie A Schneider; Robert S Wilson; David A Bennett Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Paul W H Brewster; Rebecca J Melrose; María J Marquine; Julene K Johnson; Anna Napoles; Anna MacKay-Brandt; Sarah Farias; Bruce Reed; Dan Mungas Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 3.295