Literature DB >> 23824397

A simulation trainer for complex articular fracture surgery.

Tameem M Yehyawi1, Thaddeus P Thomas, Gary T Ohrt, J Lawrence Marsh, Matthew D Karam, Thomas D Brown, Donald D Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were (1) to develop a physical model to improve articular fracture reduction skills, (2) to develop objective assessment methods to evaluate these skills, and (3) to assess the construct validity of the simulation.
METHODS: A surgical simulation was staged utilizing surrogate tibial plafond fractures. Multiple three-segment radio-opacified polyurethane foam fracture models were produced from the same mold, ensuring uniform surgical complexity between trials. Using fluoroscopic guidance, five senior and seven junior orthopaedic residents reduced the fracture through a limited anterior window. The residents were assessed on the basis of time to completion, hand movements (tracked with use of a motion capture system), and quality of the obtained reduction.
RESULTS: All but three of the residents successfully reduced and fixed the fracture fragments (one senior resident and two junior residents completed the reduction but were unsuccessful in fixating all fragments). Senior residents had an average time to completion of 13.43 minutes, an average gross articular step-off of 3.00 mm, discrete hand motions of 540 actions, and a cumulative hand motion distance of 79 m. Junior residents had an average time to completion of 14.75 minutes, an average gross articular step-off of 3.09 mm, discrete hand motions of 511 actions, and a cumulative hand motion distance of 390 m.
CONCLUSIONS: The large difference in cumulative hand motion distance, despite comparable numbers of discrete hand motion events, indicates that senior residents were more precise in their hand motions. The present experiment establishes the basic construct validity of the simulation trainer. Further studies are required to demonstrate that this laboratory-based model for articular fracture reduction training, along with an objective assessment of performance, can be used to improve resident surgical skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824397      PMCID: PMC3689258          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Smith; N Taffinder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

2.  A computational/experimental platform for investigating three-dimensional puzzle solving of comminuted articular fractures.

Authors:  Thaddeus P Thomas; Donald D Anderson; Andrew R Willis; Pengcheng Liu; Matthew C Frank; J Lawrence Marsh; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  High density polyetherurethane foam as a fragmentation and radiographic surrogate for cortical bone.

Authors:  C L Beardsley; A D Heiner; E A Brandser; J L Marsh; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

4.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system.

Authors:  Shohei Yamaguchi; Daisuke Yoshida; Hajime Kenmotsu; Takefumi Yasunaga; Kozo Konishi; Satoshi Ieiri; Hideaki Nakashima; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Simulation in orthopaedic education: an overview of theory and practice.

Authors:  James D Michelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Motion analysis: a validated method for showing skill levels in arthroscopy.

Authors:  Nick R Howells; Mark D Brinsden; Richie S Gill; Andrew J Carr; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The development of an objective model to assess arthroscopic performance.

Authors:  Aaron Insel; Bradley Carofino; Robin Leger; Robert Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Assessment of technical skills of orthopaedic surgery residents performing open carpal tunnel release surgery.

Authors:  Ann Van Heest; Matthew Putnam; Julie Agel; Janet Shanedling; Scott McPherson; Constance Schmitz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Hand motion analysis using the imperial college surgical assessment device: validation of a novel and objective performance measure in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade.

Authors:  Ki Jinn Chin; Cyrus Tse; Vincent Chan; Jyh Shen Tan; Catalin Mario Lupu; Megan Hayter
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

10.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

Authors:  R Reznick; G Regehr; H MacRae; J Martin; W McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Development of an orthopaedic surgical skills curriculum for post-graduate year one resident learners - the University of Iowa experience.

Authors:  Matthew D Karam; Brian Westerlind; Donald D Anderson; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  A surgical skills training curriculum for PGY-1 residents: AAOS exhibit selection.

Authors:  Brian Westerlind; Matthew Karam; Donald Anderson; Tameem Yehyawi; Jenniefer Kho; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Visual Interpretation of Plain Radiographs in Orthopaedics Using Eye-Tracking Technology.

Authors:  Jessica Hanley; David Warren; Natalie Glass; Daniel Tranel; Matthew Karam; Joseph Buckwalter
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

4.  Repeatability and reproducibility of a telemanipulated fracture reduction system.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Ralf Westphal; Musa Citak; Volker Stueber; Ullrich Lueke; Christian Krettek; Timo Stuebig
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-09

5.  Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Steven Long; Geb W Thomas; Matthew D Putnam; Joan E Bechtold; Matthew D Karam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Sawbones laboratory in orthopedic surgical training.

Authors:  Bandar M Hetaimish
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Orthopaedic education in the era of surgical simulation: Still at the crawling stage.

Authors:  Kivanc Atesok; Peter MacDonald; Jeff Leiter; James Dubberley; Richard Satava; Ann VanHeest; Shepard Hurwitz; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-04-18

8.  Development of a Saw Bones Model for training pedicle screw placement in scoliosis.

Authors:  Gregory Tanner; Saman Vojdani; David E Komatsu; James M Barsi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Factors Associated With the Accuracy of Depth Gauge Measurements.

Authors:  Pengcheng Liu; Joanna Xi Xiao; Chen Zhao; Xiaodong Li; Guantong Sun; Fei Yang; Xiaoqing Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-13

10.  Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hannah K James; Anna W Chapman; Giles T R Pattison; Joanne D Fisher; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2020-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.