Literature DB >> 23821714

Assessing the relative importance of environmental effects, carry-over effects and species differences in thermal stress resistance: a comparison of Drosophilids across field and laboratory generations.

Michele Schiffer1, Sandra Hangartner, Ary A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in comparing species of related organisms for their susceptibility to thermal extremes in order to evaluate potential vulnerability to climate change. Comparisons are typically undertaken on individuals collected from the field with or without a period of acclimation. However, this approach does not allow the potential contributions of environmental and carry-over effects across generations to be separated from inherent species differences in susceptibility. To assess the importance of these different sources of variation, we here considered heat and cold resistance in Drosophilid species from tropical and temperate sites in the field and across two laboratory generations. Resistance in field-collected individuals tended to be lower when compared with F1 and F2 laboratory generations, and species differences in field flies were only weakly correlated to differences established under controlled rearing conditions, unlike in F1-F2 comparisons. This reflected large environmental effects on resistance associated with different sites and conditions experienced within sites. For the 8 h cold recovery assay there was no strong evidence of carry-over effects, whereas for the heat knockdown and 2 h cold recovery assays there was some evidence for such effects. However, for heat these were species specific in direction. Variance components for inherent species differences were substantial for resistance to heat and 8 h cold stress, but small for 2 h cold stress, though this may be a reflection of the species being considered in the comparisons. These findings highlight that inherent differences among species are difficult to characterise accurately without controlling for environmental sources of variation and carry-over effects. Moreover, they also emphasise the complex nature of carry-over effects that vary depending on the nature of stress traits and the species being evaluated.

Keywords:  acclimation; cold recovery; epigenetic effects; heat knockdown; plasticity; transgenerational effects

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23821714     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.085126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  How important is thermal history? Evidence for lasting effects of developmental temperature on upper thermal limits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.

Authors:  Philippa C Griffin; Sandra B Hangartner; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A series of unfortunate events: characterizing the contingent nature of physiological extremes using long-term environmental records.

Authors:  W Wesley Dowd; Mark W Denny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Strong Costs and Benefits of Winter Acclimatization in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mads Fristrup Schou; Volker Loeschcke; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Renal neuroendocrine control of desiccation and cold tolerance by Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Selim Terhzaz; Lucy Alford; Joseph Gc Yeoh; Richard Marley; Anthony J Dornan; Julian At Dow; Shireen A Davies
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 6.  Comparative studies of critical physiological limits and vulnerability to environmental extremes in small ectotherms: How much environmental control is needed?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.654

7.  Local thermal adaptation and limited gene flow constrain future climate responses of a marine ecosystem engineer.

Authors:  Adam D Miller; Melinda A Coleman; Jennifer Clark; Rachael Cook; Zuraya Naga; Martina A Doblin; Ary A Hoffmann; Craig D H Sherman; Alecia Bellgrove
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Physiological Limits along an Elevational Gradient in a Radiation of Montane Ground Beetles.

Authors:  Rachel A Slatyer; Sean D Schoville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cross-Study Comparison Reveals Common Genomic, Network, and Functional Signatures of Desiccation Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Marina Telonis-Scott; Carla M Sgrò; Ary A Hoffmann; Philippa C Griffin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genetic and Sex-Specific Transgenerational Effects of a High Fat Diet in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kelly Dew-Budd; Julie Jarnigan; Laura K Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.