Literature DB >> 23821597

Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection and recombination.

Lauren E Nicolaisen1, Michael M Desai.   

Abstract

Purifying selection at many linked sites alters patterns of molecular evolution, reducing overall diversity and distorting the shapes of genealogies. Recombination attenuates these effects; however, purifying selection can significantly distort genealogies even for substantial recombination rates. Here, we show that when selection and/or recombination are sufficiently strong, the genealogy at any single site can be described by a time-dependent effective population size, Ne(t), which has a simple analytic form. Our results illustrate how recombination reduces distortions in genealogies and allow us to quantitatively describe the shapes of genealogies in the presence of strong purifying selection and recombination. We also analyze the effects of a distribution of selection coefficients across the genome.

Keywords:  coalescent; genealogies; linkage; purifying selection; recombination

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23821597      PMCID: PMC3761303          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.152983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Maria E Orive
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  The total branch length of sample genealogies in populations of variable size.

Authors:  A Eriksson; B Mehlig; M Rafajlovic; S Sagitov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Background selection in single genes may explain patterns of codon bias.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; M T Morgan; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet.

Authors:  J Haigh
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.

Authors:  Jon Seger; Wendy A Smith; Jarom J Perry; Jessalynn Hunn; Zofia A Kaliszewska; Luciano La Sala; Luciana Pozzi; Victoria J Rowntree; Frederick R Adler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A coalescent model of background selection with recombination, demography and variation in selection coefficients.

Authors:  K Zeng
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; David Gordon; Colleen Davis; Phil Green
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  28 in total

1.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.

Authors:  Alexandre M Harris; Nandita R Garud; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Joint Prediction of the Effective Population Size and the Rate of Fixation of Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Enrique Santiago; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Identifying and Classifying Shared Selective Sweeps from Multilocus Data.

Authors:  Alexandre M Harris; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The Temporal Dynamics of Background Selection in Nonequilibrium Populations.

Authors:  Raul Torres; Markus G Stetter; Ryan D Hernandez; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population genetic simulations of complex phenotypes with implications for rare variant association tests.

Authors:  Lawrence H Uricchio; Raul Torres; John S Witte; Ryan D Hernandez
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Studying models of balancing selection using phase-type theory.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth; Asger Hobolth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.