Literature DB >> 23821018

Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Kotaro Hirashima1, Masayuki Watanabe, Hironobu Shigaki, Yu Imamura, Satoshi Ida, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Shiro Iwagami, Yoshifumi Baba, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is a preoperatively determined inflammation-based score. Reports suggest a significant correlation between the GPS and prognosis in several cancer types. We aimed to clarify the prognostic significance of the modified GPS (mGPS) in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-four patients with gastric cancer, 195 aged < 75 years (group NE) and 99 aged > 75 years (group E), who underwent gastrectomy from March 2005 to March 2011 were enrolled. Patients with an elevated C-reactive protein level (> 0.5 mg/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (< 3.8 g/dL) were assigned a mGPS of 2, those with either 1 abnormality were assigned a mGPS of 1, and those with neither abnormality were assigned a mGPS of 0. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate the usefulness of mGPS as a prognostic indicator.
RESULTS: In the NE group, the prognosis of the 3 groups stratified by mGPS did not differ significantly. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the type of gastrectomy, peritoneal metastasis, and stage were independently associated with poor prognosis. However, group E patients with a mGPS of 2 had significantly poorer prognosis than those with a mGPS of 0 or 1. In this age group, stage and mGPS were independently associated with poor prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged > 75 years undergoing potentially curative gastrectomy, the preoperative mGPS was an independent predictor of survival. Therefore, mGPS can be a useful prognostic indicator in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23821018     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-013-0855-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  37 in total

1.  Prediction of early and late recurrence after curative resection for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Oshiro; M Mori; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Prognostic model to predict survival following first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J Lee; T Lim; J E Uhm; K W Park; S H Park; S C Lee; J O Park; Y S Park; H Y Lim; T S Sohn; J H Noh; J S Heo; C K Park; S Kim; W K Kang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  A comparison of POSSUM and GPS models in the prediction of post-operative outcome in patients undergoing oesophago-gastric cancer resection.

Authors:  Sumanta Dutta; Nesrin M Al-Mrabt; Grant M Fullarton; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paul Glen; Nigel B Jamieson; Donald C McMillan; Ross Carter; Clem W Imrie; Colin J McKay
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies?

Authors:  H J Andreyev; A R Norman; J Oates; D Cunningham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  The epidemiology of gastric cancer.

Authors:  David M Roder
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Treatment response and prognosis of patients after recurrence of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Hiroyuki Kitabayashi; Yoshihiro Nabeya; Shin-ichi Okazumi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Yutaka Funami; Yukimasa Miyazawa; Tooru Shiratori; Takashi Uno; Hisao Itoh; Takenori Ochiai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG-ps) in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew B C Crumley; Robert C Stuart; Margaret McKernan; Alexander C McDonald; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Clinical utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing curative nephrectomy for renal clear cell cancer: basis of new prognostic scoring systems.

Authors:  G W A Lamb; M Aitchison; S Ramsey; S L Housley; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The relationship between hypoalbuminaemia, tumour volume and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  R Al-Shaiba; D C McMillan; W J Angerson; E Leen; C S McArdle; P Horgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  36 in total

1.  Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinwu Zhang; Xi Chen; Tao Wu; Yan Zhang; Kun Yan; Xiaoli Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Short and long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Bo Shu; Sanlin Lei; Fazhao Li; Songwen Hua; Yong Chen; Zhi Huo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

3.  Tumour inflammatory response: adding fuel to the fire?

Authors:  M Valdes; M R Chasen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Preoperative platelet/lymphocyte ratio is a superior prognostic factor compared to other systemic inflammatory response markers in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei-wei Zhang; Ke-jun Liu; Guo-lin Hu; Wei-jiang Liang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-11

5.  Inflammatory markers as prognostic factors of recurrence in advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Valdes; J Villeda; H Mithoowani; T Pitre; M Chasen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Prognostic Significance of the Preoperative Ratio of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Yusuke Kono; Yuki Murakami; Yuji Shishido; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yoji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Keigo Ashida; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of the prognostic nutritional index on the recovery and long-term oncologic outcome of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyoung Tae Noh; Jeonghee Han; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Combined fibrinogen concentration and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Arigami; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Daisuke Matsushita; Shigehiro Yanagita; Yasuto Uchikado; Yoshiaki Kita; Shinichiro Mori; Yuko Kijima; Hiroshi Okumura; Kosei Maemura; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Comparison of Prognostic Abilities Among Preoperative Laboratory Data Indices in Patients with Resectable Gastric and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masayuki Urabe; Hiroharu Yamashita; Toshiaki Watanabe; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Dynapenia in digestive cancer outpatients: association with markers of functional and nutritional status (the FIGHTDIGO study).

Authors:  Marine Perrier; Marie-Amelie Ordan; Coralie Barbe; Camille Mazza; Damien Botsen; Johanna Moreau; Yohann Renard; Mathilde Brasseur; Barbara Tailliere; Philippe Regnault; Eric Bertin; Olivier Bouche
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.