Literature DB >> 22126664

The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead.

Anoop K Shetty1, Simon G Duckett, Ying Liang Ma, Stamatis Kapetanakis, Matthew Ginks, Julian Bostock, Gerald Carr-White, Kawal Rhode, Reza Razavi, C Aldo Rinaldi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether there is a large difference in acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to left ventricle (LV) pacing in different regions of the same coronary sinus (CS) vein. Using the four electrodes available on a Quartet LV lead, we evaluated the AHR to pacing within individual branches of the CS.
METHODS: An acute hemodynamic study was attempted in 20 patients. In each patient, we assessed AHR in a number of CS veins and along a significant proportion of each CS branch using three different bipolar configurations. We compared the AHR achieved when pacing using each different vector and also the highest AHR achieved in any position within the same patient with the lowest achieved in that patient.
RESULTS: Sixty-four different CS positions in 19 patients were successfully assessed. No significant difference in AHR was found overall between the three vectors tested. The mean percentage difference in AHR between the CS branch vectors with the lowest and highest dP/dt(max) was +6.5 ± 5.4% (P < 0.001). A much larger difference of +16.9 ± 6.1% (P < 0.001) was seen when comparing the highest and lowest AHR achieved using any vector in any position within the same patient.
CONCLUSION: A small difference in AHR is seen when pacing within the same branch of the CS compared to pacing in different branches in the same patient. This suggests that although the site of LV lead placement is important, the position within a CS branch is less important than choosing the right vein. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22126664     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03268.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Julian Bostock; Matthew Ginks; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Simon Claridge; Reza Razavi; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Acute changes in electromechanical parameters during different pacing configurations using a quadripolar left ventricular lead.

Authors:  Cinzia Valzania; Maria J Eriksson; Mauro Biffi; Giuseppe Boriani; Fredrik Gadler
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Vector selection of a quadripolar left ventricular pacing lead affects acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Stefan Asbach; Maximilian Hartmann; Tobias Wengenmayer; Erika Graf; Christoph Bode; Juergen Biermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Short-Term Availability of Viable Left Ventricular Pacing Sites with Quartet™ Quadripolar Leads.

Authors:  Min Gu; Wei Hua; Xiao-Han Fan; Li-Gang Ding; Jing Wang; Hong-Xia Niu; Cong Xu; Han Jin; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-02-11

6.  In Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block Single Lead MultiSpot Left Ventricular Pacing Does Not Improve Acute Hemodynamic Response To Conventional Biventricular Pacing. A Multicenter Prospective, Interventional, Non-Randomized Study.

Authors:  Maciej Sterliński; Adam Sokal; Radosław Lenarczyk; Frederic Van Heuverswyn; C Aldo Rinaldi; Marc Vanderheyden; Vladimir Khalameizer; Darrel Francis; Joeri Heynens; Berthold Stegemann; Richard Cornelussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Improvement of Right Ventricular Hemodynamics with Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Eoin R Hyde; Jonathan M Behar; Andrew Crozier; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Jaswinder S Gill; Mark D O'Neill; Reza Razavi; Steven A Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.976

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.