INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with heart failure. However, one-third of the patients fail to improve with this therapy. Stimulation with different left ventricular stimulation (LVS) configurations has been used to prevent diaphragmatic capture and to decrease the capture thresholds. We evaluated the hemodynamic effects of different LVS configurations using echocardiography. METHODS: Recipients of CRT systems capable of multiple LVS configurations were studied. Biventricular capture was confirmed for each polarity and echocardiographic measurements were made. The atrioventricular and interventricular delays were optimized and kept constant during the study. The cardiac output (CO), myocardial performance index (MPI), and severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) were recorded for all LVS configurations and compared for the best and the worst configurations, determined by CO. RESULTS: We studied 10 men and four women, 55 +/- 13 years of age on average. The CO and MPI changed significantly by changing the LVS configurations. The difference in CO ranged from 0.3 to 1.5 L, and seven patients (50%) showed > or =20% difference in CO between best and worst LVS configurations. Severity of MR decreased by > or =1 grade in nine patients, while in two patients MR worsened despite improvement in CO. CONCLUSIONS: Changing the LVS configuration changes hemodynamic function in some CRT system recipients.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with heart failure. However, one-third of the patients fail to improve with this therapy. Stimulation with different left ventricular stimulation (LVS) configurations has been used to prevent diaphragmatic capture and to decrease the capture thresholds. We evaluated the hemodynamic effects of different LVS configurations using echocardiography. METHODS: Recipients of CRT systems capable of multiple LVS configurations were studied. Biventricular capture was confirmed for each polarity and echocardiographic measurements were made. The atrioventricular and interventricular delays were optimized and kept constant during the study. The cardiac output (CO), myocardial performance index (MPI), and severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) were recorded for all LVS configurations and compared for the best and the worst configurations, determined by CO. RESULTS: We studied 10 men and four women, 55 +/- 13 years of age on average. The CO and MPI changed significantly by changing the LVS configurations. The difference in CO ranged from 0.3 to 1.5 L, and seven patients (50%) showed > or =20% difference in CO between best and worst LVS configurations. Severity of MR decreased by > or =1 grade in nine patients, while in two patients MR worsened despite improvement in CO. CONCLUSIONS: Changing the LVS configuration changes hemodynamic function in some CRT system recipients.