Literature DB >> 23817819

Relationship between nursing documentation and patients' mortality.

Sarah A Collins1, Kenrick Cato, David Albers, Karen Scott, Peter D Stetson, Suzanne Bakken, David K Vawdrey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses alter their monitoring behavior as a patient's clinical condition deteriorates, often detecting and documenting subtle changes before physiological trends are apparent. It was hypothesized that a nurse's behavior of recording optional documentation (beyond what is required) reflects concern about a patient's status and that mining data from patients' electronic health records for the presence of these features could help predict patients' mortality.
METHODS: Data-mining methods were used to analyze electronic nursing documentation from a 15-month period at a large, urban academic medical center. Mortality rates and the frequency of vital sign measurements (beyond required) and optional nursing comment documentation were analyzed for a random set of patients and patients who experienced a cardiac arrest during their hospitalization. Patients were stratified by age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index.
RESULTS: A total of 15,000 acute care patients and 145 cardiac arrest patients were studied. Patients who died had a mean of 0.9 to 1.5 more optional comments and 6.1 to 10 more vital signs documented within 48 hours than did patients who survived. A higher frequency of comment and vital sign documentation was also associated with a higher likelihood of cardiac arrest. Of patients who had a cardiac arrest, those with more documented comments were more likely to die.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, nursing documentation patterns have been linked to patients' mortality. Findings were consistent with the hypothesis that some features of nursing documentation within electronic health records can be used to predict mortality. With future work, these associations could be used in real time to establish a threshold of concern indicating a risk for deterioration in a patient's condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23817819      PMCID: PMC3771321          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2013426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  37 in total

1.  Effect of outliers and nonhealthy individuals on reference interval estimation.

Authors:  P S Horn; L Feng; Y Li; A J Pesce
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Measurement and impact of comorbidity in older cancer patients.

Authors:  M Extermann
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Is failure to rescue really failure to communicate? Champion the move from reactive process to proactive model.

Authors:  Julie L Classen
Journal:  Nurs Manage       Date:  2010-07

4.  The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Eric G Poon; Kenneth Guappone; Emily Campbell; Richard H Dykstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Heterogeneity is not always noise: lessons from improvement.

Authors:  Frank Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  A systems approach to the early recognition and rapid administration of best practice therapy in sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Duane Funk; Frank Sebat; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  An analysis of the phenomenon of deterioration in the critically ill.

Authors:  S K Smith
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1988

8.  Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: Cross-national findings.

Authors:  Linda H Aiken; Sean P Clarke; Douglas M Sloane
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 9.  Nurses' role in detecting deterioration in ward patients: systematic literature review.

Authors:  Mandy Odell; Christina Victor; David Oliver
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  A novel method for the efficient retrieval of similar multiparameter physiologic time series using wavelet-based symbolic representations.

Authors:  Mohammed Saeed; Roger Mark
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006
View more
  38 in total

1.  A Nursing Intelligence System to Support Secondary Use of Nursing Routine Data.

Authors:  W O Hackl; F Rauchegger; E Ammenwerth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Quantifying and Visualizing Nursing Flowsheet Documentation Burden in Acute and Critical Care.

Authors:  Sarah Collins; Brittany Couture; Min Jeoung Kang; Patricia Dykes; Kumiko Schnock; Chris Knaplund; Frank Chang; Kenrick Cato
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  A qualitative study to develop an instrument for initial nurse assessment.

Authors:  Abhijit Chakravarty; Pooja Sajan; B C Nambiar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-07-12

4.  Identifying nurses' concern concepts about patient deterioration using a standard nursing terminology.

Authors:  Min-Jeoung Kang; Patricia C Dykes; Tom Z Korach; Li Zhou; Kumiko O Schnock; Jennifer Thate; Kimberly Whalen; Haomiao Jia; Jessica Schwartz; Jose P Garcia; Christopher Knaplund; Kenrick D Cato; Sarah Collins Rossetti
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Unsupervised Machine Learning of Topics Documented by Nurses about Hospitalized Patients Prior to a Rapid-Response Event.

Authors:  Zfania Tom Korach; Kenrick D Cato; Sarah A Collins; Min Jeoung Kang; Christopher Knaplund; Patricia C Dykes; Liqin Wang; Kumiko O Schnock; Jose P Garcia; Haomiao Jia; Frank Chang; Jessica M Schwartz; Li Zhou
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  "Big data" and the electronic health record.

Authors:  M K Ross; W Wei; L Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 7.  Development and validation of early warning score system: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Li-Heng Fu; Jessica Schwartz; Amanda Moy; Chris Knaplund; Min-Jeoung Kang; Kumiko O Schnock; Jose P Garcia; Haomiao Jia; Patricia C Dykes; Kenrick Cato; David Albers; Sarah Collins Rossetti
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Physician understanding, explainability, and trust in a hypothetical machine learning risk calculator.

Authors:  William K Diprose; Nicholas Buist; Ning Hua; Quentin Thurier; George Shand; Reece Robinson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Metrics for Electronic-Nursing-Record-Based Narratives: cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Kidong Kim; Suyeon Jeong; Kyogu Lee; Hyeoun-Ae Park; Yul Ha Min; Joo Yun Lee; Yekyung Kim; Sooyoung Yoo; Gippeum Doh; Soyeon Ahn
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Sick patients have more data: the non-random completeness of electronic health records.

Authors:  Nicole G Weiskopf; Alex Rusanov; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.