P S Horn1, L Feng, Y Li, A J Pesce. 1. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0025. Mount Carmel Health System, Columbus, OH 43222, USA. paul.horn@uc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improvement in reference interval estimation using a new outlier detection technique, even with a physician-determined healthy sample, is examined. The effect of including physician-determined nonhealthy individuals in the sample is evaluated. METHODS: Traditional data transformation coupled with robust and exploratory outlier detection methodology were used in conjunction with various reference interval determination techniques. A simulation study was used to examine the effects of outliers on known reference intervals. Physician-defined healthy groups with and without nonhealthy individuals were compared on real data. RESULTS: With 5% outliers in simulated samples, the described outlier detection techniques had narrower reference intervals. Application of the technique to real data provided reference intervals that were, on average, 10% narrower than those obtained when outlier detection was not used. Only 1.6% of the samples were identified as outliers and removed from reference interval determination in both the healthy and combined samples. CONCLUSIONS: Even in healthy samples, outliers may exist. Combining traditional and robust statistical techniques provide a good method of identifying outliers in a reference interval setting. Laboratories in general do not have a well-defined healthy group from which to compute reference intervals. The effect of nonhealthy individuals in the computation increases reference interval width by approximately 10%. However, there is a large deviation among analytes.
BACKGROUND: Improvement in reference interval estimation using a new outlier detection technique, even with a physician-determined healthy sample, is examined. The effect of including physician-determined nonhealthy individuals in the sample is evaluated. METHODS: Traditional data transformation coupled with robust and exploratory outlier detection methodology were used in conjunction with various reference interval determination techniques. A simulation study was used to examine the effects of outliers on known reference intervals. Physician-defined healthy groups with and without nonhealthy individuals were compared on real data. RESULTS: With 5% outliers in simulated samples, the described outlier detection techniques had narrower reference intervals. Application of the technique to real data provided reference intervals that were, on average, 10% narrower than those obtained when outlier detection was not used. Only 1.6% of the samples were identified as outliers and removed from reference interval determination in both the healthy and combined samples. CONCLUSIONS: Even in healthy samples, outliers may exist. Combining traditional and robust statistical techniques provide a good method of identifying outliers in a reference interval setting. Laboratories in general do not have a well-defined healthy group from which to compute reference intervals. The effect of nonhealthy individuals in the computation increases reference interval width by approximately 10%. However, there is a large deviation among analytes.
Authors: Julia K Bird; Alayne G Ronnenberg; Sang-Woon Choi; Fangling Du; Joel B Mason; Zhenhua Liu Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Ann M Buchanan; Suzanne P Fiorillo; Michael W Omondi; Coleen K Cunningham; John A Crump Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Etienne Karita; Nzeera Ketter; Matt A Price; Kayitesi Kayitenkore; Pontiano Kaleebu; Annet Nanvubya; Omu Anzala; Walter Jaoko; Gaudensia Mutua; Eugene Ruzagira; Joseph Mulenga; Eduard J Sanders; Mary Mwangome; Susan Allen; Agnes Bwanika; Ubaldo Bahemuka; Ken Awuondo; Gloria Omosa; Bashir Farah; Pauli Amornkul; Josephine Birungi; Sarah Yates; Lisa Stoll-Johnson; Jill Gilmour; Gwynn Stevens; Erin Shutes; Olivier Manigart; Peter Hughes; Len Dally; Janet Scott; Wendy Stevens; Pat Fast; Anatoli Kamali Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240