| Literature DB >> 23816142 |
Catherine Bouchard1, Guy Beauchamp, Patrick A Leighton, Robbin Lindsay, Denise Bélanger, Nick H Ogden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that increasing biodiversity, specifically host diversity, reduces pathogen and parasite transmission amongst wildlife (causing a "dilution effect"), whereby transmission amongst efficient reservoir hosts, (e.g. Peromyscus spp. mice for the agent of Lyme disease Borrelia burgdorferi) is reduced by the presence of other less efficient host species. If so, then increasing biodiversity should inhibit pathogen and parasite invasion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23816142 PMCID: PMC3728044 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1and occurrence at the 71 sites in southwestern Quebec, 2007–2008.
Number and infection status (Bb+) of questing and feeding ticks in three regions of southwestern Quebec, 2007-2008
| Estrie | 16 | 17 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (0) |
| Montérégie | 53 | 83 | 251 | 681 (22) | 136 (1) | 171 (17) | 36 (2) | 1 (0) | 1276 (42) |
| Montréal | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Total | 71 | 102 | 251 | 681 (22) | 136 (1) | 173 (17) | 36 (2) | 1 (0) | 1278 (42) |
a Questing larvae were not tested for B. burgdorferi infection.
The variables, parameter estimates (β), standard errors (SE), z-values and p-values for two negative binomial generalized linear models of the count of questing and feeding ticks collected in southwestern Quebec, 2007-2008
| Model 1 | Count of questing larvae | (2008 vs 2007) | 2.18 | 0.97 | 2.25 | 0.02 | |
| | 0.39 | 0.13 | 3.01 | < 0.01 | |||
| | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2.65 | < 0.01 | |||
| | 0.92 | 0.16 | 5.83 | < 0.01 | |||
| Model 2 | Count of questing nymphs | (2008 vs 2007) | 1.72 | 0.55 | 3.15 | < 0.01 | |
| | 0.22 | 0.07 | 3.04 | < 0.01 | |||
| | 0.01 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 0.02 | |||
| Model 3 | Count of feeding larvae | 1.98 | 0.99 | 1.99 | 0.05 | ||
| | −1.68 | 0.55 | −3.05 | < 0.01 | |||
| | 0.11 | 0.04 | 2.68 | < 0.01 | |||
| 0.42 | 0.21 | 2.06 | < 0.01 | ||||
| | 1.46 | 0.43 | 3.42 | < 0.01 | |||
| | 1.10 | 0.23 | 4.80 | < 0.01 | |||
| Model 4 | Count of feeding nymphs | (2008 vs 2007) | 1.05 | 0.01 | 10.75 | < 0.01 | |
| (Summer vs spring) | −0.50 | 0.12 | 4.31 | < 0.01 | |||
| −0.18 | 0.05 | −3.49 | < 0.01 | ||||
| | −0.69 | 0.09 | −8.19 | < 0.01 | |||
| −0.04 | 0.02 | −2.49 | 0.01 | ||||
| −0.33 | 0.08 | −4.34 | < 0.01 | ||||
| 0.33 | 0.10 | 3.25 | < 0.01 | ||||
The variables, parameter estimates (β), standard errors (SE), t-values and p-values for a linear regression model of the count of species captured in southwestern Quebec, 2007-2008
| Model 5 | Numbers of | (Summer vs spring)a | 7.34 | 1.20 | 6.10 | < 0.01 | |
| 1.38 | 0.60 | 2.28 | 0.02 | ||||
a Summer months: August, September, October vs Spring months: May, June, July.
The variables, parameter estimates (β), standard errors (SE), t-values and p-values for a logistic regression model of the occurrence of infection in feeding ticks collected in southwestern Quebec, 2007–2008
| Model 6a (feeding larvae) | 1.21 | 0.39 | 3.12 | < 0.01 | ||
| Model 6b (feeding nymphs) | 2.03 | 0.93 | 2.17 | 0.03 |