| Literature DB >> 20421192 |
Nicholas H Ogden1, Catherine Bouchard, Klaus Kurtenbach, Gabriele Margos, L Robbin Lindsay, Louise Trudel, Soulyvane Nguon, François Milord.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Northward expansion of the tick Ixodes scapularis is driving Lyme disease (LD) emergence in Canada. Information on mechanisms involved is needed to enhance surveillance and identify where LD risk is emerging.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20421192 PMCID: PMC2920908 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 3Study sites for active surveillance for I. scapularis establishment. In two cases, circles indicate the overlap of two populations. The size of the circles represents the tick population index for I. scapularis population establishment calculated from the number of ticks and the number of instars collected, as described in the text. Also shown is the spatial extent of a cluster of sites positive for I. scapularis.
Figure 1The number of I. scapularis ticks submitted in passive surveillance in Quebec, number of clinics (mostly veterinary practices) that participated in passive surveillance, and mean number of ticks submitted per clinic, by year.
Figure 2Locations from which ticks submitted in passive surveillance in Quebec during 1990–2008 were obtained. Also shown is the spatial extent of a cluster of ticks collected during 2004–2008 that had a low probability of being infected with B. burgdorferi. Green circles indicate locations where ticks were evaluated by MLST analysis.
Significant factors, in logistic regression models, associated with B. burgdorferi infection in ticks collected in passive surveillance.
| Explanatory variable | No. positive/no. tested (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model A | |||
| Ticks submitted from outside space–time cluster | 273/2,139 (12.9) | Reference | |
| Ticks submitted from within cluster | 57/1,083 (4.9) | 0.38 (0.29–0.52) | < 0.001 |
| Stage of engorgement | |||
| No engorgement | 15/253 (5.9) | Reference | |
| Semiengorged | 250/2,394 (10.4) | 1.77 (1.03–3.04) | 0.038 |
| Fully engorged | 63/541 (11.6) | 1.82 (1.01–3.27) | 0.024 |
| Model B | |||
| Ticks submitted from outside space–time cluster | 273/2,139 (12.9) | Reference | |
| Ticks submitted from within cluster | 57/1,083 (4.9) | 0.36 (0.27–0.49) | < 0.001 |
| Host | |||
| Human | 15/280 (5.3) | Reference | |
| Dog | 193/2,044 (9.4) | 1.85 (1.08–3.20) | 0.020 |
| Cat | 122/892 (13.7) | 3.01 (1.72–5.26) | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Two models are presented because stage of engorgement and host of origin of ticks were collinear.
Data on host or state of engorgement were missing from 20 ticks, so numbers of tested ticks are not identical for each variable.
Significant variables in ordinal logistic regression models in which the outcome was the tick population index for each study site without (model A) and with (model B) accounting for whether or not sites occurred within an identified spatial cluster.
| Explanatory variable | OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Model A | ||
| Value for predicted climate suitability | 1.019 (1.01–1.03) | < 0.001 |
| 2008 versus 2007 | 6.76 (1.79–25.53) | 0.005 |
| Model B | ||
| Value for predicted climate suitability | 1.017 (1.01–1.03) | 0.001 |
| 2008 versus 2007 | 6.20 (1.66–23.10) | 0.007 |
| Site occurred within versus outside the cluster | 10.80 (3.00–39.25) | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Results of analysis of MLST STs, IGS type, and ospC major group and the corresponding RST type for each sample analyzed.
| Tick | ST | IGS type | RST | U.S. region | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QC07-785 | 1 | 1 | A | 1 | NE |
| QC07-908 | 1 | 1 | A | 1 | NE |
| QC07-161-5 | 1 | 1 | A | 1 | NE |
| QC07-83 | 1 | 1 | A | 1 | NE |
| QC07-493 | 3 | 2 | K | 2 | NE |
| QC07-765 | 3 | 2 | K | 2 | NE |
| QC07-84 | 3 | 2 | K | 2 | NE |
| QC07-951 | 3 | 2 | K | 2 | NE |
| QC07-1054 | 3 | 2 | K | 2 | NE |
| QC07-565b | 4 | 2 | H | 2 | NE |
| QC07-755 | 7 | 3 | B | 1 | NE |
| QC07-399 | 8 | 4 | F | 3 | NE |
| QC07-603 | 8 | 4 | F | 3 | NE |
| QC07-815 | 8 | 4 | F | 3 | NE |
| QC07-819 | 8 | 4 | F | 3 | NE |
| QC07-723 | 11 | 5 | C | 3 | NE |
| QC07-776 | 12 | 6 | M | 3 | MW |
| QC07-1008 | 14 | 6 | G | 3 | NE |
| QC07-181-1 | 14 | 6 | G | 3 | NE |
| QC07-181-4 | 14 | 6 | G | 3 | NE |
| QC07-182-4 | 14 | 6 | G | 3 | NE |
| QC07-182-6 | 14 | 6 | A | 3 | NE |
| QC07-650 | 16 | 7 | I | 3 | NE |
| QC07-484 | 29 | 2 | L | 2 | MW |
| QC07-344 | 38 | 5 | D | 3 | NE |
| QC07-362 | 34 | 5 | J | 3 | NE |
| QC07-402 | 238 | 4 | N | 3 | — |
| QC07-595 | 36 | 4 | N | 3 | NE |
| QC07-851 | 59 | 3 | B | 1 | NE |
| QC07-1048 | 59 | 3 | B | 1 | NE |
| QC07-175-3 | 59 | 3 | B | 1 | NE |
The region of the United States where each ST has been found: NE, Northeast; MW, Midwest.
All ticks were engorged adult ticks collected in passive surveillance except these five questing adults collected in active surveillance.
Data from these four questing adult ticks were collected at one field site during active surveillance.
ST 238 is novel to this study.